Comparison of Prophylactic Effects between Localized Biomimetic Minocycline and Systematic Amoxicillin on Implants Placed Immediately in Infected Sockets

Author:

Lee Won-Woo1,Seo Jin-Won1,Jang Il-Seok2,Kwon Young-Joong2,Joung Won-Jun1ORCID,Jun Jong-Hun1,Kim Jiyeong3ORCID,Son Donghee4,Lim Seung-Weon5ORCID,Yun Seo-Hyoung1,Tallarico Marco6ORCID,Park Chang-Joo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea

2. Osstem R&D Center, Seoul 07789, Republic of Korea

3. Department of Pre-Medicine, College of Medicine and Biostatistics Lab, Medical Research Collaborating Center (MRCC), Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea

4. Laboratory of Biostatistical Consulting and Research, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Industry-University Cooperation Foundation, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea

5. Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea

6. Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07021 Sassari, Italy

Abstract

This study evaluated the prophylactic effect of localized biomimetic minocycline and systemic amoxicillin on immediate implant placement at infected extraction sites. Twelve mongrels with six implants each were randomly assigned to five groups: uninfected negative control (Group N); infected with oral complex bacteria (Group P); infected and treated with amoxicillin one hour before implant placement (Group A); infected and treated with minocycline during implant placement (Group B); and infected and treated with amoxicillin one hour before implant placement and with minocycline during implant placement (Group C). Radiographic bone level, gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), papillary bleeding index (PBI), and removal torque (RT) were recorded. There was no significant difference between Groups A, B, and C for bone loss. Group A showed the highest RT, the lowest PBI, and significantly lower GI and PD values than Group P. Group B exhibited significantly higher RT value than Group N and significantly smaller PD value than Group P at 6 w postoperatively. Localized minocycline could improve implant success by reducing bone loss and increasing RT and systemic amoxicillin could maintain the stability of the peri-implant soft tissue. However, combined use of these two antibiotics did not augment the prophylactic effect.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Molecular Medicine,Biomedical Engineering,Biochemistry,Biomaterials,Bioengineering,Biotechnology

Reference37 articles.

1. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages;Lazzara;Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent.,1989

2. Immediate placement of dental implants into debrided infected dentoalveolar sockets;Casap;J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.,2007

3. The immediate implant: Bone preservation and bone regeneration;Werbitt;Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent.,1992

4. An infected jawbone site compromising successful osseointegration;Quirynen;Periodontol 2000,2003

5. Immediate implants: Their current status;Barzilay;Int. J. Prosthodont.,1993

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3