Customized Subperiosteal Implants for the Rehabilitation of Atrophic Jaws: A Consensus Report and Literature Review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Customized Subperiosteal Implants for the Rehabilitation of Atrophic Jaws: A Consensus Report and Literature Review

Published:2024-01-22 Issue:1 Volume:9 Page:61
ISSN:2313-7673
Container-title:Biomimetics
language:en
Short-container-title:Biomimetics

Author:

Herce-López Javier¹,Pingarrón Mariano del Canto²,Tofé-Povedano Álvaro³^ORCID,García-Arana Laura⁴,Espino-Segura-Illa Marc⁵^ORCID,Sieira-Gil Ramón⁶^ORCID,Rodado-Alonso Carlos⁷,Sánchez-Torres Alba⁸,Figueiredo Rui⁸^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, 41009 Seville, Spain

2. Private Practice Clínica del Canto, 28290 Madrid, Spain

3. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, 11009 Cádiz, Spain

4. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, San Francisco de Asís University Hospital, 28002 Madrid, Spain

5. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Bellvitge University Hospital, 08907 Barcelona, Spain

6. Oral and Maxillofacial Consultant, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain

7. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Private Practice Cimax, 17002 Girona, Spain

8. Professors of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Researchers at the IDIBELL Institute, University of Barcelona (Spain), 08907 Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

(1) Background: The aim was to perform a literature review on customized subperiosteal implants (CSIs) and provide clinical guidelines based on the results of an expert consensus meeting held in 2023. (2) Methods: A literature search was performed in Pubmed (MEDLINE) in July 2023, including case series and cohort studies with a minimum follow-up of 6 months that analyzed totally or partially edentulous patients treated with CSIs. Previously, an expert consensus meeting had been held in May 2023 to establish the most relevant clinical guidelines. (3) Results: Six papers (four case series and two retrospective cohort studies) were finally included in the review. Biological and mechanical complication rates ranged from 5.7% to 43.8% and from 6.3% to 20%, respectively. Thorough digital planning to ensure the passive fit of the CSI is mandatory to avoid implant failure. (4) Conclusions: CSIs are a promising treatment option for rehabilitating edentulous patients with atrophic jaws; they seem to have an excellent short-term survival rate, a low incidence of major complications, and less morbidity in comparison with complex bone grafting procedures. As the available data on the use of CSIs are very scarce, it is not possible to establish clinical recommendations based on scientific evidence.

Funder

University of Barcelona

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Molecular Medicine,Biomedical Engineering,Biochemistry,Biomaterials,Bioengineering,Biotechnology

Link

https://www.mdpi.com/2313-7673/9/1/61/pdf

Reference38 articles.

1. Design modifications in subperiosteal implants to avoid complications. Presentation of a case series study and literature re-view;Rev. Esp. Cir. Oral Maxilofac.,2023

2. Branemark, P.-I. (1998). Zygomaticus Fixture Clinical Procedures, Nobel Biocare AB. [1st ed.].

3. Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: An updated systematic review;Chrcanovic;J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.,2016

4. Subperiosteal personalised implants for the rehabilitation of the severely deficient edentulous maxilla. Revision of a clinical series of 8 cases;Pons;Rev. Esp. Cir. Oral Maxilofac.,2021

5. Borre, C.V.D., Rinaldi, M., De Neef, B., Loomans, N.A.J., Nout, E., Van Doorne, L., Naert, I., Politis, C., Schouten, H., and Klomp, G. (2021). Radiographic evaluation of bone re-modeling after additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implantation (Amsji) in the maxilla: A one-year follow-up study. J. Clin. Med., 10.