Ursodeoxycholic Acid Does Not Improve COVID-19 Outcome in Hospitalized Patients

Author:

Colapietro Francesca12ORCID,Angelotti Giovanni13,Masetti Chiara2,Shiffer Dana14,Pugliese Nicola12ORCID,De Nicola Stella2,Carella Francesco1,Desai Antonio14ORCID,Ormas Monica2,Calatroni Marta15ORCID,Omodei Paolo6,Ciccarelli Michele7,Aliberti Stefano17,Reggiani Francesco15,Bartoletti Michele18,Cecconi Maurizio19,Lleo Ana12ORCID,Aghemo Alessio12,Voza Antonio14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy

2. Division of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy

3. Humanitas Artificial Intelligence Center, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy

4. Emergency Department, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy

5. Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy

6. Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy

7. Division of Respiratory Medicine, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy

8. Infectious Disease Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCSS, 20089 Milan, Italy

9. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Humanitas University IRCCS, 20090 Milan, Italy

Abstract

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was demonstrated to reduce susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro and improve infection course in chronic liver diseases. However, real-life evidence is lacking. We analyzed the impact of UDCA on COVID-19 outcomes in patients hospitalized in a tertiary center. Between January 2020 and January 2023, among 3847 patients consecutively hospitalized for COVID19, 57 (=UDCA group) were taking UDCA. The UDCA and the control groups (n = 3790) did not differ concerning comorbidities including diabetes mellitus type 2 (15.8% vs. 12.8%) and neoplasia (12.3% vs. 9.4%). Liver diseases and vaccination rate were more common in the UDCA group (14.0% vs. 2.5% and 54.4% vs. 30.2%, respectively). Overall mortality and CPAP treatment were 22.8 % and 15.7% in the UDCA, and 21.3% and 25.9% in the control group. Mortality was similar (p = 0.243), whereas UDCA was associated with a lower rate of CPAP treatment (OR = 0.76, p < 0.05). Treatment with UDCA was not an independent predictor of survival in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Virology,Infectious Diseases

Reference26 articles.

1. (2023, February 16). Therapeutics and COVID-19. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/health-care-readiness/COVID-19/therapeutics.

2. Bench-to-bedside: Innovation of small molecule anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs in China;Yang;Eur. J. Med. Chem.,2023

3. Fighting the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic requires a global approach to understanding the heterogeneity of vaccine responses;Tomalka;Nat. Immunol.,2022

4. Remdesivir for the Treatment of COVID-19—Final Report;Beigel;N. Engl. J. Med.,2020

5. Remdesivir for 5 or 10 Days in Patients with Severe COVID-19;Goldman;N. Engl. J. Med.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3