Study on Disturbance Mechanism of Squeezed and Non-Squeezed Soil Piles on Soft Soil Foundation

Author:

Lin Chengyuan1,Wang Ruyi2ORCID,Huang Mengshuang2,Huang Lebin2,Tan Qinwen2

Affiliation:

1. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063, China

2. Badong National Observation and Research Station of Geohazards, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Abstract

The construction process of pile foundations can significantly disrupt the soil. Therefore, it is necessary to limit the degree of soil disturbance caused by pile foundation construction to an acceptable level. This paper examines the disturbance effects of pile driving on soft soil foundations, specifically analyzing the squeezing effect of squeezed soil piles and the unloading effect of non-squeezed soil piles. To investigate these effects, two typical squeezed soil piles, a hydrostatic pile, and a bag grouting pile, as well as a typical non-squeezed soil pile (a bored pile) are selected. Specifically, a novel construction method for numerical models, which simulates the mechanical processes of different pile types under standard grids, is proposed. Three crucial indicators—soil displacement field, stress field, and disturbance influence range—are chosen to compare the disturbance effects of three types of piles on the soil. Results indicate that the two types of squeezed soil piles cause significant disturbance to the soil displacement field, especially in the horizontal direction, while causing a relatively slight disturbance to the soil stress field. Among the two of them, the disturbance magnitude and range of the hydrostatic pile are greater than those of the bag grouting pile. For the non-squeezed soil pile, the soil displacement field changes minimally and the stress field remains basically unchanged during the pile driving process of the bored pile. To compare and quantify the disturbance effects of three types of piles on soil, the soil disturbance range in the horizontal direction of each pile is normalized by its radius. Results indicate that the horizontal disturbance values of maximum horizontal stress for all three types of piles are approximately 1/5 of the pile length above the pile tip, with normalized values of 7.6, 5.5, and 3.5, respectively. The maximum horizontal deformation disturbance range in the horizontal direction occurs near the ground surface and has normalized values of 15.2, 7.5, and 1.1 for the three types of piles, respectively. Therefore, the hydrostatic pile has the greatest disturbance effect, followed by the bag grouting pile and the bored pile. However, within the allowable range of disturbance in practical engineering, the optimal piling method can be selected by comprehensively considering factors such as the construction difficulty and economic costs.

Funder

China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd.

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Post doctoral innovation practice positions in Hubei Province

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3