Quantitative Evaluation of Fundus Autofluorescence in Laser Photocoagulation Scars for Diabetic Retinopathy: Conventional vs. Short-Pulse Laser

Author:

Kimura Toshiya1,Ogura Shuntaro2ORCID,Yasukawa Tsutomu2ORCID,Nozaki Miho12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, Laser Eye Center, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, Nagoya 464-8547, Japan

2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan

Abstract

Short-pulse laser is popular for its advantages like less pain. However, its effectiveness is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare fundus autofluorescence (FAF) luminosity changes of laser photocoagulation scars between the conventional laser (0.2 s) and the short-pulse laser (0.02 s) for diabetic retinopathy. Conventional and short-pulse laser photocoagulations were performed in six and seven eyes, respectively. FAF images were captured at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after the treatments. To evaluate FAF, individual gray-scale values of the laser scars adjacent to the retinal arcade vessels were recorded; then, the mean gray values of the scars were divided by the luminosity of arcade vein. The average luminosity ratio of laser scars at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months were 1.51 ± 0.17, 1.26 ± 0.07, 1.21 ± 0.03, 0.95 ± 0.11, and 0.89 ± 0.05 with conventional laser and 1.91 ± 0.13, 1.50 ± 0.15, 1.26 ± 0.08, 1.18 ± 0.06, and 0.97 ± 0.04 with short-pulse laser, respectively. Findings suggest the short-pulse laser displayed delayed hypoautofluorescence progression. This implies potential postponement in post-irradiation atrophic changes, as well as metabolic amelioration delay in the ischemic retina, when compared to conventional laser treatment.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Paleontology,Space and Planetary Science,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference52 articles.

1. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy;Yau;Diabetes Care,2012

2. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (2016). Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: A pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet, 387, 1513–1530.

3. Diabetic retinopathy;Cheung;Lancet,2010

4. Vascular endothelial growth factor and diabetic macular edema;Lally;Surv. Ophthalmol.,2016

5. Early Photocoagulation for Diabetic Retinopathy (1991). ETDRS report number 9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology, 98, 766–785.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3