Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery on Anatomic Liver Segmentectomy Using the Extrahepatic Glissonean Approach

Author:

Kato Yutaro12ORCID,Sugioka Atsushi3,Kojima Masayuki4,Uyama Ichiro2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya 454-8509, Japan

2. Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan

3. International Medical Center, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan

4. Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan

Abstract

Accurate minimally invasive anatomic liver (sub)segmentectomy (MIAS) is technically demanding and not yet standardized, and its surgical outcomes are undefined. To study the impact of the minimally invasive approach on perioperative outcomes of anatomic liver (sub)segmentectomy (AS), we retrospectively studied and compared perioperative outcomes of 99 open AS (OAS) and 112 MIAS (laparoscopic 77, robotic 35) cases using the extrahepatic Glissonean approach, based on the 1:1 propensity score matched analyses. After matching (71:71), MIAS was superior to OAS in terms of blood loss (p < 0.0001), maximum postoperative serum total bilirubin (p < 0.0001), C-reactive protein (p = 0.034) levels, R0 resection rate (p = 0.021), bile leak (p = 0.049), and length of hospital stay (p < 0.0001). The matched robotic and laparoscopic AS groups (30:30) had comparable outcomes in terms of operative time, blood loss, transfusion, open conversion, postoperative morbidity and mortality, R0 resection, and hospital stay, although the rate of Pringle maneuver application (p = 0.0002) and the postoperative aspartate aminotransferase level (p = 0.002) were higher in the robotic group. Comparing the matched posterosuperior (sub)segmentectomy cases or unmatched repeat hepatectomy cases between MIAS and OAS, we observed significantly less blood loss and shorter hospital stays in MIAS. Robotic AS yielded comparable outcomes with laparoscopic AS in the posterosuperior (sub)segmentectomy and repeat hepatectomy settings, despite the worse tumor and procedural backgrounds in robotic AS. In conclusion, various types of MIAS standardized by the extrahepatic Glissonean approach were feasible and safe with more favorable perioperative outcomes than those of OAS. Although robotic AS had almost comparable outcomes with laparoscopic AS, robotics may serve to decrease the surgical difficulty of MIAS in selected patients undergoing posterosuperior (sub)segmentectomy and repeat hepatectomy.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference32 articles.

1. The Brisbane 2000 Terminology of Liver Anatomy and Resections;Strasberg;HPB,2000

2. The Tokyo 2020 terminology of liver anatomy and resections: Updates of the Brisbane 2000 system;Wakabayashi;J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci.,2022

3. Segment-oriented approach to liver resection;Liau;Surg. Clin. N. Am.,2004

4. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma;Hasegawa;Ann. Surg.,2005

5. Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy;Makuuchi;Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.,1985

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3