A Hybrid Model for 30-Day Syncope Prognosis Prediction in the Emergency Department

Author:

Dipaola Franca1,Gatti Mauro2,Menè Roberto3ORCID,Shiffer Dana45,Giaj Levra Alessandro5,Solbiati Monica6ORCID,Villa Paolo7,Costantino Giorgio6,Furlan Raffaello15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Internal Medicine, Syncope Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy

2. IBM, 20100 Milan, Italy

3. Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20100 Milan, Italy

4. Emergency Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy

5. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy

6. Emergency Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, 20100 Milan, Italy

7. Emergency Medicine Unit, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20100 Milan, Italy

Abstract

Syncope is a challenging problem in the emergency department (ED) as the available risk prediction tools have suboptimal predictive performances. Predictive models based on machine learning (ML) are promising tools whose application in the context of syncope remains underexplored. The aim of the present study was to develop and compare the performance of ML-based models in predicting the risk of clinically significant outcomes in patients presenting to the ED for syncope. We enrolled 266 consecutive patients (age 73, IQR 58–83; 52% males) admitted for syncope at three tertiary centers. We collected demographic and clinical information as well as the occurrence of clinically significant outcomes at a 30-day telephone follow-up. We implemented an XGBoost model based on the best-performing candidate predictors. Subsequently, we integrated the XGboost predictors with knowledge-based rules. The obtained hybrid model outperformed the XGboost model (AUC = 0.81 vs. 0.73, p < 0.001) with acceptable calibration. In conclusion, we developed an ML-based model characterized by a commendable capability to predict adverse events within 30 days post-syncope evaluation in the ED. This model relies solely on clinical data routinely collected during a patient’s initial syncope evaluation, thus obviating the need for laboratory tests or syncope experienced clinical judgment.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3