How Political Ideology and Media Shaped Vaccination Intention in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States

Author:

Sarathchandra Dilshani1ORCID,Johnson-Leung Jennifer1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Culture, Society & Justice, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA

Abstract

As a pharmaceutical intervention, vaccines remain a major public health strategy for mitigating the effects of COVID-19. Yet, vaccine intake has been affected by various cognitive and cultural factors. We examine how a selected set of factors (i.e., knowledge, concern, media, peer influence, and demographics) shaped COVID-19 vaccination intention in the early phase of the pandemic (Fall 2020). Using a survey conducted in three US states (Idaho, Texas, and Vermont) just prior to the rollout of the first vaccines against COVID-19, we find that COVID-19 concern was the primary driver of vaccination intention. Concern was shaped mainly by two factors: political ideology and media sources. Yet, ideology and media were much more important in affecting concern for those who leaned politically conservative, as opposed to those who leaned liberal or remained moderate. The results from our structural equation models affirm that the information politically conservative respondents were receiving reinforced the effects of their ideology, leading to a greater reduction in their concern. We discuss the potential implications of these findings for future pandemic preparedness.

Funder

NIH Center for Modeling Complex Interactions

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference41 articles.

1. CDC (2024, March 03). COVID-19 Vaccinations in the United States, Available online: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-people-booster-percent-pop5.

2. FDA (2024, March 03). FDA Takes Action on Updated mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines to Better Protect against Currently Circulating Variants, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-action-updated-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-better-protect-against-currently-circulating.

3. Social and moral psychology of COVID-19 across 69 countries;Azevedo;Sci. Data,2023

4. Ridenhour, B.J., Sarathchandra, D., Seamon, E., Brown, H., Leung, F.-Y., Johnson-Leon, M., Megheib, M., Miller, C.R., and Johnson-Leung, J. (2022). Effects of trust, risk perception, and health behavior on COVID-19 disease burden: Evidence from a multi-state US survey. PLoS ONE, 17.

5. Van Bavel, J.J., Pretus, C., Rathje, S., Pärnamets, P., Vlasceanu, M., and Knowles, E.D. (2022). The costs of polarizing a pandemic: Antecedents, consequences, and lessons. Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 17456916231190395.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3