Brain Extraction Methods in Neonatal Brain MRI and Their Effects on Intracranial Volumes

Author:

Vaz Tânia F.1ORCID,Canto Moreira Nuno2,Hellström-Westas Lena3,Naseh Nima3,Matela Nuno1ORCID,Ferreira Hugo A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal

2. Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden

3. Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in assessing early brain development and injury in neonates. When using an automated volumetric analysis, brain tissue segmentation is necessary, preceded by brain extraction (BE) to remove non-brain tissue. BE remains challenging in neonatal brain MRI, and despite the existence of several methods, manual segmentation is still considered the gold standard. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess different BE methods in the MRI of preterm neonates and their effects on the estimation of intracranial volumes (ICVs). This study included twenty-two premature neonates (mean gestational age ± standard deviation: 28.4 ± 2.1 weeks) with MRI brain scans acquired at term, without detectable lesions or congenital conditions. Manual segmentation was performed for T2-weighted scans to establish reference brain masks. Four automated BE methods were used: Brain Extraction Tool (BET2); Simple Watershed Scalping (SWS); HD Brain Extraction Tool (HD-BET); and SynthStrip. Regarding segmentation metrics, HD-BET outperformed the other methods with median improvements of +0.031 (BET2), +0.002 (SWS), and +0.011 (SynthStrip) points for the dice coefficient; and −0.786 (BET2), −0.055 (SWS), and −0.124 (SynthStrip) mm for the mean surface distance. Regarding ICVs, SWS and HD-BET provided acceptable levels of agreement with manual segmentation, with mean differences of −1.42% and 2.59%, respectively.

Funder

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Bolsa de Investigação para Doutoramento

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference90 articles.

1. Volpe, J.J. (2008). Neurology of the Newborn, Saunders. [5th ed.].

2. Lagercrantz, H., Hanson, M.A., Ment, L.R., and Peebles, D.M. (2010). The Newborn Brain, Cambridge University Press.

3. MRI of the Neonatal Brain: A Review of Methodological Challenges and Neuroscientific Advances;Dubois;J. Magn. Reason. Imaging,2021

4. British Association of Perinatal Medicine (2023, November 30). Neonatal Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Clinical Indications, Acquisition and Reporting. Available online: https://www.bapm.org/resources/neonatal-brain-magnetic-resonance-imaging.

5. Computational Neuroanatomy of Baby Brains: A Review;Li;NeuroImage,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3