Ecological Carrying Capacity Estimation of the Trails in a Protected Area: Integrating a Path Analysis Model and the Stakeholders’ Evaluation

Author:

Chang Han-Chin1ORCID,Hsieh Cheng-I2ORCID,Yu Chin-Chung3,Lin Yann-Jou1,Lin Bau-Show1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10647, Taiwan

2. Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10647, Taiwan

3. Department of Horticulture, Hungkuo Delin University of Technology, New Taipei 23654, Taiwan

Abstract

Trails are important recreation settings; determining an appropriate trail usage amount to avoid unacceptable ecological impacts is important for protected areas. However, there is a lack of studies examining trail usage’s direct and indirect relationships and the influence of landscape-level conditions to evaluate ecological carrying capacity. This study integrated a path analysis model and stakeholder assessment to estimate the ecological carrying capacity of trails in a protected area. This study surveyed the biophysical environment along the trails and conducted a path analysis to establish the use–impact model for the trails in the study area. Based on the use–impact model, this study developed four-level usage scenarios and collected the stakeholders’ acceptance evaluation to determine the ecological carrying capacity range. The results showed that the weekly usage of the trails directly affected the soil hardness and plant coverage of the trail. The trail’s soil hardness directly affected the surrounding soil hardness, decreasing its plant coverage, while the vegetation type and slope also affected its plant cover. The stakeholders of the Mt. Xiaoguanyin Area reached a consensus on the ecological carrying capacity range, which was 288 to 404 total weekly hikers. The study results revealed the effect paths of the landscape-level conditions and usage impacts and provided managers with an implementable ecological carrying capacity. The estimation framework could be a reference for determining ecological carrying capacity in other protected areas.

Funder

Yangmingshan National Park Administration

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Forestry

Reference58 articles.

1. Outdoor Foundation 2022 (2022, September 27). 2022 Outdoor Participation Trends Report. Available online: https://outdoorindustry.org/resource/2022-outdoor-participation-trends-report/.

2. COVID-19 and outdoor recreation management: Increased participation, connection to nature, and a look to climate adaptation;Beery;J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour.,2021

3. Hammitt, W., Cole, D., and Monz, C. (2015). Wildland Recreation: Ecology and Management, John Wiley & Sons.

4. Manning, R.E. (2011). Studies in Outdoor Recreation: Search and Research for Satisfaction, Oregon State University Press. [3rd ed.].

5. Limits of Acceptable Change: A New Framework for Managing the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex;Stankey;Western Wildlands,1984

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3