Survival of Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat “Guacamole”: Role of Added Antimicrobials
Author:
Al Daour Rameez12, Osaili Tareq M.234, Semerjian Lucy15ORCID, Dhanasekaran Dinesh Kumar2, Ismail Leila Cheikh236ORCID, Savvaidis Ioannis N.127
Affiliation:
1. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates 2. Research Institute of Medical and Health Sciences (RIMHS), University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates 3. Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates 4. Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan 5. Research Institute of Science and Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates 6. Nuffield Department of Women’s & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK 7. Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Food Microbiology, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
Abstract
Ensuring the microbiological safety of food products is majorly important to regulatory agencies, producers, and consumers. This study aimed to examine the effects of three different antimicrobial agents, including chitosan (CH), mastic oil (M), and citric acid (CA), individually or as a combination, against Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes (artificially inoculated) in Guacamole, a ready-to-eat (RTE) avocado-based salad. The Guacamole samples included untreated samples, designated as CNL, and samples treated as follows: CA 0.15% and CA 0.30% with citric acid added at 0.15% and 0.30% v/w; CH 0.5% and CH 1% with chitosan at 0.5 and 1% v/w; M 0.2% and M 0.4% with mastic essential oil (EO) at 0.2% and 0.4% v/w; CACH with CA 0.30% and CH 1% v/w; CAM with CA 0.30% and M 0.4% v/w; CHM with CH 1% and M 0.4% v/w; and CACHM with CA 0.30%, CH 1%, and M 0.4% v/w. Microbiological evaluation, monitoring of the pH values, and proximate analyses (moisture, fat, protein, ash, and water activity) were performed at different time intervals (days 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7) at two storage temperatures (4 and 10 °C). Antimicrobial treatments, particularly CH 1% and CACHM, effectively (p < 0.05) reduced Salmonella spp. and E. coli O157:H7 populations at 4 °C, while CACHM showed the most efficacy against L. monocytogenes. However, at 10 °C, antimicrobials had limited impact, and the bacterial counts exhibited an increasing trend during storage. The pH values in the avocado-based salad samples showed, in general, higher decreases at 10 compared to 4 °C, with the CHM combination showing the highest antimicrobial effect.
Funder
University of Sharjah
Reference33 articles.
1. FDA (2024, June 24). Microbiological Surveillance Sampling: FY18-21 Fresh Herbs (Cilantro, Basil & Parsley) and Processed Avocado and Guacamole Assignments, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/sampling-protect-food-supply/microbiological-surveillance-sampling-fy18-21-fresh-herbs-cilantro-basil-parsley-assignment. 2. Hass avocado composition and potential health effects;Dreher;Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.,2013 3. Bovo, F. (2015). Definition of Food Safety Criteria for Bacteria Food-Borne Pathogens in Ready to Eat Products. [Ph.D. Thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna]. 4. Successful management of Listeria spp. in an avocado processing facility;Strydom;Food Control,2016 5. Rodríguez-García, M. (2011). Bases Experimentales para el diseño de Prácticas Agrícolas Sanitarias Durante el Cultivo y la Cosecha del Aguacate (Persea americana, var. Hass) [Experimental Basis for Designing Agricultural Sanitary Practices during Cultivation and Harvesting of Avocado (Persea americana, var. Hass)]. [Ph.D. Thesis, Centro Universitario de la Costa (CUCosta), Universidad de Guadalajara].
|
|