Can Campus Green Spaces Be Restorative? A Case Study from Tanzania

Author:

Kanelli Argyro Anna1ORCID,Vardaka Maria Lydia1ORCID,Malesios Chrisovaladis2ORCID,Katima Zainab Jamidu3ORCID,Kalantzi Olga-Ioanna1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Environment, University of the Aegean, 81100 Mytilene, Greece

2. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece

3. Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35131, Tanzania

Abstract

Evidence from studies in the global north has shown the beneficial effects of green spaces (GS) for our psychological and physiological health. In this study, we examine whether the connection between GS, wellbeing, and restoration is also applicable to low/middle-income countries (LMICs), using Tanzania as a case study. During May–July 2021, an online survey was conducted among 108 students and/or staff of the University of Dar es Salaam. Information was provided regarding exposure to campus’s green spaces (CGSs) measured by the NDVI and subjective questions relevant to accessibility/availability of CGS, duration and frequency of visits, as well as perceived greenness. Self-reported questions were also used for assessing the quality of CGSs and motives for using them. Mental wellbeing and restoration were measured with the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Short Scale ((S)WEMWBS) and the Restoration Outcome Scale (ROS), respectively, while the Nature Relatedness Scale (NR-6) was used to determine the feelings and thoughts of our participants towards nature. Generalized linear regression indicated a positive relationship between the need to be close to nature and relaxation as motivators for visiting CG; (S)WEMWBS (p < 0.05). The same correlation was observed for the ROS (p < 0.01). The ROS was also positively associated with the NDVI (p < 0.01), age group of 18–25 (p < 0.05), and employment status (full time p < 0.01, part time p < 0.05). Our findings confirm that GS can be considered an effective tool for promoting SDG 3 and SDG 11 in LMICs. More importantly, urban planners should focus on the motives for using such places in order to make them inclusive and multifunctional.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference202 articles.

1. Perspectives in Poverty and Mental Health;Marbin;Front. Public Health,2022

2. World Health Organization (2022). World Mental Health Report: Transforming Mental Health for All, World Health Organization. Executive summary.

3. Urban Public Parks and Mental Health in Adult Women: Mediating and Moderating Factors;Bojorquez;Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry,2018

4. Mortality in Mental Disorders and Global Disease Burden Implications a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;Walker;JAMA Psychiatry,2015

5. Estimating the True Global Burden of Mental Illness;Vigo;Lancet Psychiatry,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3