Shielded Cone Coil Array for Non-Invasive Deep Brain Magnetic Stimulation
-
Published:2024-01-09
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:32
-
ISSN:2079-6374
-
Container-title:Biosensors
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biosensors
Author:
Abu Yosef Rawan1ORCID, Sultan Kamel1ORCID, Mobashsher Ahmed Toaha1ORCID, Zare Firuz1, Mills Paul C.2, Abbosh Amin1
Affiliation:
1. The School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia 2. The School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia
Abstract
Non-invasive deep brain stimulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation is a promising technique for treating several neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. However, the currently used coils do not demonstrate the required stimulation performance in deep regions of the brain, such as the hippocampus, due to the rapid decay of the field inside the head. This study proposes an array that uses the cone coil method for deep stimulation. This study investigates the impact of magnetic core and shielding on field strength, focality, decay rate, and safety. The coil’s size and shape effects on the electric field distribution in deep brain areas are also examined. The finite element method is used to calculate the induced electric field in a realistic human head model. The simulation results indicate that the magnetic core and shielding increase the electric field intensity and enhance focality but do not improve the field decay rate. However, the decay rate can be reduced by increasing the coil size at the expense of focality. By adopting an optimum cone structure, the proposed five-coil array reduces the electric field attenuation rate to reach the stimulation threshold in deep regions while keeping all other regions within safety limits. In vitro and in vivo experimental results using a head phantom and a dead pig’s head validate the simulated results and confirm that the proposed design is a reliable and efficient candidate for non-invasive deep brain magnetic stimulation.
Reference69 articles.
1. Progress: Neurogenesis in adult primate neocortex: An evaluation of the evidence;Rakic;Nat. Rev. Neurosci.,2002 2. Chemical and Anatomical Plasticity of Brain;Bennett;Science,1964 3. Poorganji, M., Zomorrodi, R., Zrenner, C., Bansal, A., Hawco, C., Hill, A.T., Hadas, I., Rajji, T.K., Chen, R., and Zrenner, B. (2023). Pre-Stimulus Power but Not Phase Predicts Prefrontal Cortical Excitability in TMS-EEG. Biosensors, 13. 4. Hossain, A., Islam, M.T., Rahman, T., Chowdhury, M.E.H., Tahir, A., Kiranyaz, S., Mat, K., Beng, G.K., and Soliman, M.S. (2023). Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classification from Sensor-Based Portable Microwave Brain Imaging System Using Lightweight Deep Learning Models. Biosensors, 13. 5. Non-Invasive Magnetic Stimulation of Human Motor Cortex;Barker;Lancet,1985
|
|