Comparative Analysis of Stromal Vascular Fraction and Alternative Mechanisms in Bone Fracture Stimulation to Bridge the Gap between Nature and Technological Advancement: A Systematic Review

Author:

Goncharov Evgeniy Nikolaevich1,Koval Oleg Aleksandrovich1,Nikolaevich Bezuglov Eduard1,Engelgard Mikhail1,Igorevich Eremin Ilya1,Velentinovich Kotenko Konstantin1,Encarnacion Ramirez Manuel De Jesus2ORCID,Montemurro Nicola3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, 121359 Moscow, Russia

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia

3. Department of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana (AOUP), 56100 Pisa, Italy

Abstract

Background: Various stimulation methods, including electrical, ultrasound, mechanical, and biological interventions, are explored, each leveraging intricate cellular and molecular dynamics to expedite healing. The advent of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) marks a significant stride, offering multifarious benefits in bone healing, from enhanced bone formation to optimal vascular integration, drawing a harmonious balance between innate mechanisms and scientific advancements. Methods: This systematic review was conducted focusing on literature from 2016 to 2023 and encompassing various bone healing stimulation mechanisms like SVF, electrical, ultrasound, and mechanical stimulation. The extracted data underwent meticulous synthesis and analysis, emphasizing comparative evaluations of mechanisms, applications, and outcomes of each intervention. Results: The reviewed studies reveal the potential of SVF in bone fracture healing, with its regenerative and anti-inflammatory effects. The purification of SVF is crucial for safe therapeutic use. Characterization involves flow cytometry and microscopy. Studies show SVF’s efficacy in bone regeneration, versatility in various contexts, and potential for clinical use. SVF appears superior to electrical, ultrasound, and mechanical stimulation, with low complications. Conclusions: This review compares bone healing methods, including SVF. It provides valuable insights into SVF’s potential for bone regeneration. However, due to limited human studies and potential bias, cautious interpretation is necessary. Further research is essential to validate these findings and determine the optimal SVF applications in bone healing.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference70 articles.

1. Regulation of fracture repair by growth factors;Bolander;Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.,1992

2. Byock, I. (2012). The Best Care Possible: A Physician’s Quest to Transform Care through the End of Life, Avery.

3. The biology of fracture healing: Optimizing outcome;Marsh;Br. Med. Bull.,1999

4. Bone fracture healing within a continuum bone remodelling framework;Schmidt;Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng.,2022

5. The biology of fracture healing;Marsell;Injury,2011

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3