Abstract
The overload of health information has been a major challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public health authorities play a primary role in managing this information. However, individuals have to apply critical health literacy to evaluate it. The objective of this paper is to identify targets for strengthening critical health literacy by focusing on the field of argumentation theory. This paper is based on the textual analysis of instances of health information through the lens of argumentation theory. The results show that critical health literacy benefits from: (1) understanding the concept of argument and the supporting reasons, (2) identifying the main argument schemes, and (3) the knowledge and use of the main critical questions to check the soundness of arguments. This study operationalizes the main aspects of critical health literacy. It calls for specific educational and training initiatives in the field. Moreover, it argues in favor of broadening the current educational curricula to empower individuals to engage in informed and quality decision making. Strengthening individuals’ critical health literacy involves interventions to empower in argument evaluation. For this purpose, argumentation theory has analytical and normative frameworks that can be adapted within a lay-audience education concept.
Funder
Swiss National Science Foundation
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference33 articles.
1. WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19-5 March 2020https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19-5-march-2020
2. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: A systematic review;Eysenbach;JAMA,2002
3. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art
4. Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency
5. Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation;Brennen;Reuters Inst.,2020
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献