Ports in a Storm: Port-City Environmental Challenges and Solutions
-
Published:2023-06-18
Issue:12
Volume:15
Page:9722
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Roberts Toby1ORCID, Williams Ian1ORCID, Preston John2, Clarke Nick3, Odum Melinda3, O’Gorman Stefanie4
Affiliation:
1. Infrastructure Group, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK 2. Transportation Group, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK 3. Ramboll UK Ltd., Southampton SO15 2AQ, UK 4. Ramboll UK Ltd., Edinburgh EH2 3BU, UK
Abstract
The potential detrimental environmental impact of ports is vast, and port-cities bear the brunt of this. It is essential that future port-city development proceeds in such a way as to reduce the environmental impact that port activity creates for the city and local area. This global study of port authorities in 26 countries and city authorities in 13 countries investigated the current views on pollution, levels of adoption of mitigation measures, future plans, levels of interest in adoption and barriers to key measures for reducing a port’s environmental impact. This reveals consensus on key areas between port and city authorities for the first time. Water pollution was found to be the number one environmental concern of port authorities globally. Air, noise and waste were also found to be important forms of pollution in ports, both from the perspective of port and city authorities and in terms of complaints received. Ports largely have facilities for recycling, although the majority have no set recycling plans, with 62% of ports having none in place. Targets should be encouraged, as well as circular economy approaches, if this is to be addressed. Renewable energy, electric port equipment, building efficiency improvements, electric port and harbour vessels and shore-to-ship power all have high levels of support from port and city authorities, although costs provide the largest barriers to implementation. Greater cooperation between port-city stakeholders is necessary to overcome the large financial barriers that appear to be preventing ports from pursuing the environmental improvements they are interested in.
Funder
EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Sustainable Infrastructure Systems
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference74 articles.
1. The Southampton System: A new universal standard approach to port-city classification;Roberts;Marit. Policy Manag.,2020 2. Roberts, T., Williams, I., Preston, J., Clarke, N., Odum, M., and O’Gorman, S. (2021). Love Thy Neighbour: Social Benefits and Port-City Relationships. Sustainability, 13. 3. Roberts, T., Williams, I., Preston, J., Clarke, N., Odum, M., and O’Gorman, S. (2021). A Virtuous Circle? Increasing Local Benefits from Ports by Adopting Circular Economy Principles. Sustainability, 13. 4. Miola, A., Paccagnan, V., Mannino, I., Massarutto, A., Perujo, A., and Turvani, M. (2009). External Costs of Transportation. Case Study: Maritime Transport, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. 5. (2022, June 13). OECD The Competitiveness of Global Port Cities: Synthesis Report. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/Competitiveness-of-Global-Port-Cities-Synthesis-Report.pdf.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|