Affiliation:
1. Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Minho, Gualtar Campus, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
2. MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ARNET-Aquatic Research Network, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
Abstract
The importance of quantitatively assessing the spatial patterns of geodiversity, and their intrinsic relationship with biodiversity and the ecosystem services provided to society, has been signalized by several authors, due to the relevance of this information in territorial management, the planning of environmental and conservation strategies. Within geodiversity method assessments, the grid system is the most widely used GIS spatial approach to calculate a geodiversity index. Preferred for its simplicity, it implies the fundamental decision of choosing the scale of the analysis, defined by the selection of cell size, determinant for the accuracy and correctness of the final maps. Although this topic has been occasionally approached by some authors within geodiversity assessments, there is no formal procedure for cell size selection. This is a key issue, and, in the scope of the present work, an empirical procedure to select optimal cell size(s) was tested on the national scale in Portugal, in lithology and geomorphology datasets. The quantitative method based on geodiversity indices was applied, using richness, diversity and evenness indices, in a hexagonal analytical grid, through eight cell dimensions. Several descriptive statistical parameters were analyzed, with particular emphasis on dispersion statistical measures. Optimal cell size corresponded to the minimum cell size, once dispersion values were significatively reduced or stabilized, and distributions from evenness and diversity indices were closer to symmetry, which provided more accurate results and higher spatial differentiation, although the final decision should always consider the main purposes of the analysis.
Funder
European Social Fund
FCT
Associate Laboratory ARNET
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation
Reference74 articles.
1. Gray, M. (2013). Geodiversity: Valuing and Conserving Abiotic Nature, Wiley Blackwell. [2nd ed.].
2. Sharples, C. (2002). Concepts and Principles of Geoconservation, Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife. [3rd ed.].
3. Geodiversidad: Propuesta de una definición integradora;Nieto;Bol. Geol. Min.,2001
4. Geodiversity: A theoretical and applied concept;Serrano;Geogr. Helv.,2007
5. Geodiversity: The concept and scope of geodiversity;Kozlowski;Prz. Geol.,2004
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献