Can Pharmacological Conditioning as an Add-On Treatment Optimize Standard Pharmacological Treatment in Patients with Recent-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis? A Proof-of-Principle Randomized Clinical Trial

Author:

Manaï Meriem12,van Middendorp Henriët123ORCID,van der Pol Joy A.4ORCID,Allaart Cornelia F.4,Dusseldorp Elise5,Veldhuijzen Dieuwke S.123,Huizinga Tom W. J.4,Evers Andrea W. M.12367

Affiliation:

1. Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9500, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands

2. Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9500, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands

3. The Center for Interdisciplinary Placebo Studies Leiden, P.O. Box 9500, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands

4. Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

5. Methodology and Statistics Unit, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9500, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands

6. Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

7. Medical Delta (Collaboration of Leiden University, Technical University Delft and Erasmus University), 2629 JH Delft, The Netherlands

Abstract

Medication regimens using conditioning via variable reinforcement have shown similar or improved therapeutic effects as full pharmacological treatment, but evidence in patient populations is scarce. This proof-of-principle double-blind randomized clinical trial examined whether treatment effects in recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be optimized through pharmacological conditioning. After four months of standardized treatment (n = 46), patients in clinical remission (n = 19) were randomized to the Control group (C), continuing standardized treatment (n = 8), or the Pharmacological Conditioning (PC) group, receiving variable treatment according to conditioning principles (n = 11). After eight months, treatment was tapered and discontinued linearly (C) or variably (PC). Standard treatment led to large improvements in disease activity and HRQoL in both groups. The groups did not differ in the percentage of drug-free clinical remission obtained after conditioning or continued standard treatment. The PC group did show a larger decrease in self-reported disease activity (Cohen’s d = 0.9) and a smaller increase in TNF-α levels (Cohen’s d = 0.7) than the C group. During all phases, more differences between groups were found for the patients who followed protocol than for the intention-to-treat sample. Although the results are not conclusive, pharmacological conditioning may have some advantages in terms of disease progression and stability, especially during the conditioning phase, compared with standard clinical treatment. The effects may be particularly beneficial for patients who show a good initial response to increased medication dosages.

Funder

European Research Council Consolidator Grant 2013

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3