Chiropractors in Multidisciplinary Teams: Enablers of Colocation Integration in GP-Led Primary Healthcare

Author:

Fjaagesund Shauna Dawn12ORCID,Graham Wayne3,Jones Evan12,Ladhams Andrew4ORCID,Sayers Mark1ORCID,Campbell Gary5,Hou Xiang-Yu6ORCID,Ungureanu Marius-Ionut78ORCID,Oprescu Florin1

Affiliation:

1. School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs 4556, Australia

2. Health Developments Corporation, Morayfield 4506, Australia

3. School of Business and Creative Industries, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs 4556, Australia

4. Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4072, Australia

5. Brain Treatment Centre Australia, Morayfield 4506, Australia

6. Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba 4350, Australia

7. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

8. Center for Health Workforce Research and Policy, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore and document the enablers and barriers of chiropractic care colocation in general practice at a large-scale private primary care centre in Australia. This study focused on the perceptions of healthcare professionals regarding this integration. The research setting was a large integrated primary care centre located in an outer metro, low-socioeconomic area in the City of Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. Participant inclusion criteria included general medical practitioners, practice nurses, and medical managers who self-reported interactions with the physically collocated and integrated chiropractic practice. Data was collected from 22 participants using face-to-face, qualitative, semi-structured interviews with an average duration of 32 min. The data collected included perceptions of chiropractic treatment, enablers to patient referral pathways, and views of the integrated chiropractic care model. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted on the data set. All participants reported that this was their first exposure to the colocation of a chiropractor within a general medical practice. Four key enablers of chiropractic care integration were identified: (1) the practitioner [chiropractor], (2) the organisation [general practice], (3) consumer flow, and (4) the environment [shared spaces and tenant ecosystem]. The chiropractic integration enhanced knowledge sharing and interprofessional trust among healthcare providers. The formal reporting of patient outcomes and understanding of the chiropractor’s scope of practice further enabled referrals to the service. Shared administrative and business processes, including patient records, booking systems, and clinical meetings, facilitated relationship development between the chiropractor and referring health providers. Colocation as part of a larger primary care centre created proximity and convenience for health providers in terms of interprofessional communication, and for patients, in terms of access to chiropractic services. Existing governance structures supported communication, professional education, and shared values related to the delivery of patient-centred care. Identified barriers included limited public funding for chiropractic services resulting in reduced access for patients of low-socioeconomic status. Additionally, scepticism or negativity towards the discipline of chiropractic care was identified as an initial barrier to refer patients. In most cases, this view towards the chiropractor was overcome by regular patient reporting of positive treatment outcomes to their GP, the delivery of education sessions by the chiropractor for the health providers, and the development of interprofessional trust between the chiropractor and referring health providers. This study provides preliminary evidence and a conceptual framework of factors influencing the successful integration of chiropractic care within an Australian large primary care centre. The data collected indicated that integration of chiropractic care into a primary care centre serving a low-socioeconomic region can be achieved with a high degree of health provider satisfaction.

Funder

HDC

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference31 articles.

1. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Low Back Pain, 1990–2020, Its Attributable Risk Factors, and Projections to 2050: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021;Ferreira;Lancet Rheumatol.,2023

2. Cost, Controversy, Crisis: Low Back Pain and the Health of the Public;Deyo;Annu. Rev. Public Health,1991

3. Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Spine Pain;Rubin;Neurol. Clin.,2007

4. Combined Chiropractic Interventions for Low-Back Pain;Walker;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2010

5. Multidisciplinary Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation for Chronic Low Back Pain;Kamper;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3