Zero Tolerance for Coercion? Historical, Cultural and Organisational Contexts for Effective Implementation of Coercion-Free Mental Health Services around the World

Author:

Whittington Richard123,Aluh Deborah Oyine45ORCID,Caldas-de-Almeida Jose-Miguel4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Research & Education in Security, Prisons and Forensic Psychiatry, Forensic Department Østmarka, St. Olav’s Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway

2. Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science & Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, Norway

3. Department of Public Health, Policy & Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK

4. Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Comprehensive Health Research Centre, Nova Medical School, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal

5. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka 410105, Nigeria

Abstract

Coercion of service users/patients when receiving care and treatment has been a serious dilemma for mental health services since at least the 18th century, and the debate about how best to minimise or even eradicate compulsion remains intense. Coercion is now, once again and rightly, at the top of the international policy agenda and the COST Action ‘FOSTREN’ is one example of a renewed commitment by service user advocates, practitioners and researchers to move forward in seriously addressing this problem. The focus of service improvement efforts has moved from pure innovation to practical implementation of effective interventions based on an understanding of the historical, cultural and political realities in which mental health services operate. These realities and their impact on the potential for change vary between countries across Europe and beyond. This article provides a novel overview by focusing on the historical, cultural and political contexts which relate to successful implementation primarily in Europe, North America and Australasia so that policy and practice in these and other regions can be adopted with an awareness of these potentially relevant factors. It also outlines some key aspects of current knowledge about the leading coercion-reduction interventions which might be considered when redesigning mental health services.

Funder

“la Caixa” Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference121 articles.

1. Council of Europe (2023, June 12). Ending Coercion in Mental Health: The Need for a Human Rights-Based Approach. Available online: https://pace.coe.int/en/files/28038/html.

2. Zero tolerance of violence by users of mental health services: The need for an ethical framework;Behr;Br. J. Psychiatry,2005

3. Attitudes towards patient aggression amongst mental health nurses in the ‘zero tolerance’ era: Associations with burnout and length of experience;Whittington;J. Clin. Nurs.,2002

4. Lessons to be learned from the oldest community psychiatric service in the world: Geel in Belgium;BJPsych Bull.,2016

5. Origins of Psychiatric Hospitalization in Medieval Spain;Baldessarini;Psychiatr. Q.,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3