A Survey of Utilization and Satisfaction of Korean Subfertility Treatment among Korean Women

Author:

Park Minjung1ORCID,Shin Seungwon2ORCID,Kim Jihye3ORCID,Kim Jong-hyun4,Kim Dong-Il5,Sung Soo-Hyun6ORCID,Park Jang-Kyung7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health and Administration, Seoul Digital University, Seoul 07654, Republic of Korea

2. College of Korean Medicine, Sangji University, Wonju 26339, Republic of Korea

3. Research Institute of Korean Medicine Policy, The Association of Korean Medicine, Seoul 07525, Republic of Korea

4. Department of Medical Classics and History, College of Korean Medicine, Gachon University, Seongnam 13306, Republic of Korea

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju 38066, Republic of Korea

6. Department of Policy Development, National Institute for Korean Medicine Development, Seoul 04516, Republic of Korea

7. Department of Korean Medicine Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University Korean Medicine Hospital, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Low fertility is a critical social problem worldwide, and infertility has a prevalence of 15%. This cross-sectional study aimed to understand the factors affecting the usage and satisfaction of Korean medicine (KM) in subfertile women. An online survey was conducted from 3 November to 8 November 2021. The survey collected basic information, KM treatment experience, and satisfaction from women who experienced poor pregnancy. The t-test and chi-square test (χ2-test) were used to determine the overall characteristics of the subjects and factors affecting the utilization and satisfaction of KM treatment. Of the total of 29,465 people, 4922 read the survey email, and 601 responded. After excluding 51 respondents with questionable response patterns, 550 respondents were included in the final analysis. Of these, 43.1% (n = 237) had experience with conventional treatment, and 16.5% (n = 91) had received KM treatment. The group that received both KM treatment and CM treatment (n = 59, 24.9%) was significantly more prevalent than the group that received KM treatment alone (n = 32, 10.2%) (p = 0.00). Women who had given birth more than once or held a master’s degree were significantly more willing to participate in the ‘KM Support Project for Subfertility’ program. Our findings suggest that subfertile patients prefer integrated treatment that combines KM and CM treatments. Further studies are needed to assess the status of integrative medicine treatment, satisfaction with each KM intervention, factors for low satisfaction, and patient requirements.

Funder

Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3