Mechanical Behavior of One-Piece and Two-Piece Tapered Prosthetic Abutments with 11.5 and 16 Degrees

Author:

Tolesano Loureiro Karine Regina1ORCID,Boaventura de Moura Marcos2ORCID,de Oliveira Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes3,Resende Novais Veridiana4ORCID,Zancopé Karla1,Simamoto Júnior Paulo Cézar1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia 38405-320, MG, Brazil

2. Independent Researcher, Curitiba 80820-520, PR, Brazil

3. Department of Periodontology and Implantology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia 38405-320, MG, Brazil

4. Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia 38405-320, MG, Brazil

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the mechanical behavior of two-piece abutments (Morse taper with 16° internal angulation and Morse taper with 11.5° internal angulation) before and after cyclic fatigue testing, following ISO 14801:2016 guidelines. The specimens were divided into three groups: a modified Morse taper with a taper angle of 16° (GM group), a conventional Morse taper (taper angle of 11.5° deg) with a two-piece (CMt group), and one-piece abutments (CMo group). Each experimental group was formed by ten implants and ten abutments (n = 10) for a total of 30 specimens (n = 30). The abutments were tightened and loosened, and a fatigue test was applied with 15 Hz and 5 × 106 cycles. Subsequently, the abutments were loosened, and a pull-out test was performed on the CMt group. Finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted on stress concentration regions. The statistical analysis of the loosening test was performed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (p < 0.05) to compare screw loosening within each group and between the groups with and without mechanical fatigue. Significant differences were found among the three groups in the loosening test when analyzing the values with and without fatigue (p < 0.001) within each group. When the groups were compared with each other, there was also a significant difference between them (p < 0.001), except between groups GM and CMt without fatigue (p = 0.840). In the pull-out test of the CMt group, the sample exhibited frictional locking only after fatigue (mean = 94.2 N). The FEA demonstrated a varied stress distribution in all groups. The stress was found to be more concentrated in the upper third and middle third regions of the implant, as well as in the opposite region of the load application for all three groups. Although the CMo group showed lower rates of loosening, it displayed a poorer stress distribution in comparison to the GM and CMt groups. On the other hand, the CMt group exhibited a satisfactory frictional lock after undergoing the fatigue tests.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference27 articles.

1. Mechanics of the taper integrated screwed-in (TIS) abutments used in dental implants;Bozkaya;J. Biomech.,2005

2. Influence of screw surface treatment on retention of implant-supported fixed partial dentures;Rodrigues;J. Oral. Implantol.,2017

3. Torque required to loosen single-tooth implant abutment screws before and after simulated function;Breeding;Int. J. Prosthodont.,1993

4. Effects of abutment screw preload and preload simulation techniques on dental implant lifetime;Satpathy;J. Repr. Line,2022

5. Performance of conical abutment (Morse Taper) connection implants: A systematic review;Schmitt;J. Biomed. Mater Res. A,2014

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3