Nurses’ Perception Regarding the Quality of Communication between Nurses and Physicians in Emergency Departments in Saudi Arabia: A Cross Sectional Study

Author:

Daheshi Nawal1,Alkubati Sameer A.23ORCID,Villagracia Hazel2,Pasay-an Eddieson4,Alharbi Ghadeer5,Alshammari Farhan6ORCID,Madkhali Norah7ORCID,Alshammari Bushra2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Jazan Academic Affairs and Training Administration, Jazan 85539, Saudi Arabia

2. Medical Surgical Nursing Department, College of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail 2440, Saudi Arabia

3. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hodeida University, Hodeida P.O. Box 3114, Yemen

4. Maternal and Child Nursing Department, College of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail 2440, Saudi Arabia

5. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK

6. Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 2440, Saudi Arabia

7. Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background: One of the defining characteristics of safe and highly reliable patient care is effective team communication. It is becoming increasingly crucial to improve communication among healthcare team members since social and medical conditions change quickly. Main aim: The present study seeks to assess nurses’ perception of the quality of communications between physicians and nurses and associated factors in the emergency departments of selected government hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in five hospitals in Jazan and three hospitals in Hail City, Saudi Arabia, on a convenience sample of 250 nurses total using self-administered questionnaires. Independent sample t-tests and one-way ANOVA were used for the data analysis. Ethical considerations were adhered to throughout the conduct of the study. Results: The mean score of all domains of nurses’ perceptions of the quality of nurse–physician communication in emergency departments was 60.14 out of 90. The highest mean score was observed in the openness subdomain, followed closely by relevance and satisfaction, with mean percentages of 71.65% and 71.60%, respectively. Age, level of education, years of experience, and job position had significant positive correlations with nurses’ perceptions of the quality of nurse–physician communication. (p = 0.002, 0.016, 0.022, and 0.020, respectively). Post hoc tests showed that nurses older than 30, those with diplomas, those with more than 10 years’ experience, and those in supervisory positions had more positive perceptions of the quality of nurse–physician communication. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the mean scores of quality of nurse–physician communication with regard to participants’ sex, marital status, nationality, and working hours (p > 0.05). Multiple linear regression showed that none of the independent factors affected the nurses’ perceptions of the quality of nurse–physician communication in emergency departments (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Overall, the quality of communication between nurses and physicians was not satisfactory. Future research should be meticulously planned, using validated outcome measures, that will capture and reflect the goals of communication among healthcare teams.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference37 articles.

1. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: Time for a revolution;Kruk;Lancet Glob. Health,2018

2. Henriksen, K., Battles, J.B., Keyes, M.A., and Grady, M.L. (2008). Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

3. Nurse-physician communication -An integrated review;Tan;J. Clin. Nurs.,2017

4. Emergency nurse practitioners and doctors consulting with patients in an emergency department: A comparison of communication skills and satisfaction;Sandhu;Emerg. Med. J.,2009

5. Nurse-Physician Inter-Professional Collaboration and Associated Factors at Public Hospitals in Dessie City, Amhara, Northeastern Ethiopia, 2021;Endris;J. Multidiscip. Healthc.,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3