Health Management: Evaluating the Relationship between Organizational Factors, Psychosocial Risks at Work, Performance Management, and Hospital Outcomes

Author:

Gaspar Tânia12ORCID,Gomez-Baya Diego3ORCID,Guedes Fábio Botelho2ORCID,Correia Manuela Faia24ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Digital Human-Environment Interaction Labs (HEI-LAB), Universidade Lusófona, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal

2. Institute of Environmental Health (ISAMB), Lisbon University, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal

3. Department of Social, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Universidad de Huelva, 21004 Huelva, Spain

4. COMEGI—Centro de Investigação em Organizações, Mercados e Gestão Industrial, Lusiada University, 1349-001 Lisbon, Portugal

Abstract

Introduction—Health system (HS) health organizations are complex and are in constant dynamic interaction with multiple elements, including political, environmental, societal, legal, and organizational factors, along with human components, such as human resources, patients, and other stakeholders. Objective—This research aimed to study three HS organizations, identifying and characterizing the elements of health organizations and the factors related to professionals, determining their influence on economic and financial performance results, as well as results related to the professionals and to the patients comprising the institutions. Method—A quantitative study was conducted in which data were collected through questionnaires from various sources to better understand and characterize the factors related to organizations, professionals, and patients (470 health professionals and 768 patients). To test the integrated evaluation model for health organizations, path analysis was used. Results—The results reveal that the organizational culture (OC) presents a positive relationship between the professional’s quality of life (QL) and the performance management (PM) of the professionals, along with a negative relationship with the psychosocial work risks (PWR). There is also a relationship between the OC and patient satisfaction (PS), professional job satisfaction (PJS), and economic and financial results (EFR). In the relationship between the processes and the results, there are significant relationships between PM and PJS and PWR and PJS. In terms of the results, there is a significant relationship between the EFR and the PS. Conclusions—This study contributes to a deeper knowledge of the factors that influence the quality of health organizations and their results and produces recommendations for health organizations to address the current challenges.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference87 articles.

1. System theories: An overview of various system theories and its application in healthcare;Cordon;Am. J. Syst. Sci.,2013

2. The systems theory of management in modern day organizations-a study of Aldgate congress resort limited Port Harcourt;Chikere;Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ.,2015

3. Chuang, S., and Inder, K. (2009). An effectiveness analysis of healthcare systems using a systems theoretic approach. BMC Health Serv. Res., 9.

4. Systems transformation: Learning from change in 60 countries;Braithwaite;J. Health Organ. Manag.,2019

5. World Health Organization (WHO) (2007). Building Leadership and Management Capacity in Health, World Health Organization.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3