An Evaluation of Different Sweet Olive Cultivars with Different Ripening Degrees Grown in the Puglia Region, Southeastern Italy
-
Published:2024-08-14
Issue:8
Volume:10
Page:861
-
ISSN:2311-7524
-
Container-title:Horticulturae
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Horticulturae
Author:
Alhajj Ali Salem1ORCID, Mazzeo Andrea1, Trani Antonio2ORCID, Pitardi Simona1, Bisceglie Sara1, Ferrara Giuseppe1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy 2. Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari, Via Ceglie 9, 70010 Valenzano, Italy
Abstract
Some olive cultivars grown in southeastern Italy are characterized by the production of olives with a reduced level of bitterness. They are known as sweet olive cultivars and fruits are usually consumed directly or cooked without any debittering process, offering either health benefits to consumers, thanks to the high content of antioxidants, or an economic benefit to farmers for their higher price with respect to both table and oil olives. This study evaluates and compares the organoleptic, pomological, chemical, and physical parameters of seven sweet olive cultivars at different ripening degrees in the Puglia region over 8 weeks of maturity stage for two consecutive seasons (2022 and 2023). The organoleptic evaluation was performed by a restricted panel of usual consumers/experts of sweet olives. The results showed a higher preference for the olive cultivars locally named Triggiano Dolce, Cerasella, and Mele. Significant differences in weight, length, and width of the fruits were observed based on both cultivar and year. The phenolic composition of olive cultivars was significantly affected by both cultivar and harvest year, with Cazzinicchio and Cellina di Nardò having the highest total polyphenols. The analysis of water fraction extracted from olive samples by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry led to the identification of eleven compounds belonging to the secoiroids, phenylpropanoids, phenylethanolids, and flavonoids classes. The comparison of these compounds among the studied cultivars highlighted significant differences.
Funder
European Union Next-GenerationEU (PIANO NAZIONALE DI RIPRESA E RESILIENZA
Reference35 articles.
1. Gandul-Rojas, B., and Gallardo-Guerrero, L. (2020). Characterization and Processing of Table Olives: A Special Issue. Foods, 9. 2. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2024, July 10). FAOSTAT Database. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. 3. International Olive Oil Council (IOC) (2024, July 10). Production Data for Table Olives. Available online: https://www.internationaloliveoil.org/what-we-do/economic-affairs-promotion-unit/#figures. 4. Perpetuini, G., Caruso, G., Urbani, S., Schirone, M., Esposto, S., Ciarrocchi, A., Prete, R., Garcia-Gonzalez, N., Battistelli, N., and Gucci, R. (2018). Changes in Polyphenolic Concentrations of Table Olives (Cv. Itrana) Produced Under Different Irrigation Regimes During Spontaneous or Inoculated Fermentation. Front. Microbiol., 9. 5. Boskou, D. (2006). Olive Oil: Chemistry and Technology, AOCS Publishing. [2nd ed.].
|
|