Umbilical Vein Blood Flow in Uncomplicated Pregnancies: Systematic Review of Available Reference Charts and Comparison with a New Cohort

Author:

Barbieri Moira1ORCID,Zamagni Giulia2ORCID,Fantasia Ilaria1ORCID,Monasta Lorenzo2ORCID,Lo Bello Leila1,Quadrifoglio Mariachiara1,Ricci Giuseppe13ORCID,Maso Gianpaolo1,Piccoli Monica1,Di Martino Daniela Denis4,Ferrazzi Enrico Mario45ORCID,Stampalija Tamara13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mother and Neonate, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, 34100 Trieste, Italy

2. Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, 34100 Trieste, Italy

3. Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34100 Trieste, Italy

4. Department of Mother, Child and Neonate, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Policlinico di Milano, 20100 Milan, Italy

5. Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Milan, 20100 Milan, Italy

Abstract

The objectives of the study were (1) to perform a systematic review of the available umbilical vein blood flow volume (UV-Q) reference ranges in uncomplicated pregnancies; and (2) to compare the findings of the systematic review with UV-Q values obtained from a local cohort. Available literature in the English language on this topic was identified following the PRISMA guidelines. Selected original articles were further grouped based on the UV sampling sites and the formulae used to compute UV-Q. The 50th percentiles, the means, or the best-fitting curves were derived from the formulae or the reported tables presented by authors. A prospective observational study of uncomplicated singleton pregnancies from 20+0 to 40+6 weeks of gestation was conducted to compare UV-Q with the results of this systematic review. Fifteen sets of data (fourteen sets belonging to manuscripts identified by the research strategy and one obtained from our cohort) were compared. Overall, there was a substantial heterogeneity among the reported UV-Q central values, although when using the same sampling methodology and formulae, the values overlap. Our data suggest that when adhering to the same methodology, the UV-Q assessment is accurate and reproducible, thus encouraging further investigation on the possible clinical applications of this measurement in clinical practice.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3