Gathering the Stakeholder’s Perspective: Experiences and Opportunities in Rare Genetic Disease Research

Author:

White Lauren K.,Crowley T. BlaineORCID,Finucane Brenda,McClellan Emily J.,Donoghue Sarah,Garcia-Minaur Sixto,Repetto Gabriela M.ORCID,Fischer Matthias,Jacquemont Sebastien,Gur Raquel E.,Maillard Anne M.ORCID,Donald Kirsten A.ORCID,Bassett Anne S.ORCID,Swillen AnnORCID,McDonald-McGinn Donna M.ORCID

Abstract

Background: Research participant feedback is rarely collected; therefore, investigators have limited understanding regarding stakeholders’ (affected individuals/caregivers) motivation to participate. Members of the Genes to Mental Health Network (G2MH) surveyed stakeholders affected by copy number variants (CNVs) regarding perceived incentives for study participation, opinions concerning research priorities, and the necessity for future funding. Respondents were also asked about feelings of preparedness, research burden, and satisfaction with research study participation. Methods: Modified validated surveys were used to assess stakeholders´ views across three domains: (1) Research Study Enrollment, Retainment, Withdrawal, and Future Participation; (2) Overall Research Experience, Burden, and Preparedness; (3) Research Priorities and Obstacles. Top box score analyses were performed. Results: A total of 704 stakeholders´ responded from 29 countries representing 55 CNVs. The top reasons for initial participation in the research included reasons related to education and altruism. The top reasons for leaving a research study included treatment risks and side effects. The importance of sharing research findings and laboratory results with stakeholders was underscored by participants. Most stakeholders reported positive research experiences. Conclusions: This study provides important insight into how individuals and families affected with a rare CNV feel toward research participation and their overall experience in rare disease research. There are clear targets for areas of improvement for study teams, although many stakeholders reported positive research experiences. Key findings from this international survey may help advance collaborative research and improve the experience of participants, investigators, and other stakeholders moving forward.

Funder

National Institute of Health

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics

Reference24 articles.

1. Implementation of a Research Participant Satisfaction Survey at an Academic Medical Center;Smailes;Clin. Res. Alex. Va,2016

2. Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA;Adler;J. Clin. Transl. Sci.,2020

3. Patient satisfaction with clinical trial participation;Verheggen;Int. J. Qual. Health Care J. Int. Soc. Qual. Health Care,1998

4. The Relationship between Patients’ Perception of Care and Measures of Hospital Quality and Safety;Isaac;Health Serv. Res.,2010

5. Assessing research participants’ perceptions of their clinical research experiences;Kost;Clin. Transl. Sci.,2011

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3