Affiliation:
1. Urbanism Lab, Social Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
Abstract
Scale is a significant although understudied dimension of cities. To better understand scale and flesh out the range of issues and debates involved in its conception, we conducted thirty-three in-depth interviews with a wide range of urban actors: developers, planners, policymakers, leaders of non-profit community organizations, and scholars. We wanted to know how contemporary urban actors in the U.S. conceive of scale as a factor in development? How is “small-scale” vs. “large-” or “mega-scale” differentiated, and are they inter-related? What are the pros and cons of both small- vs. large-scale projects? Four themes emerged from our interviews: scale definition, barriers to small-scale development, scale evaluation, and solutions for overcoming barriers to small-scale development. The point of this survey was to better understand possible responses and attitudes about scale among those involved in the urban development process.
Reference32 articles.
1. Dittmar, H. (2020). DIY City: The Collective Power of Small Actions, Island Press.
2. Ballon, H., and Kenneth, T.J. (2007). Robert Moses and the Modern City: The Transformation of New York, Norton.
3. Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., and Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition, Cambridge University Press.
4. Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam;Fainstein;Int. J. Urban Reg. Res.,2008
5. Trial-and-error urbanism: Addressing obduracy, uncertainty and complexity in urban planning and design;Dotson;J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain.,2016