The Average Direct, Indirect and Total Effects of Environmental Concern on Pro-Environmental Behavior

Author:

Hernández-Alemán Anastasia1,Cruz-Pérez Noelia2ORCID,Santamarta Juan C.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Tourism and Sustainable Economic Development (TiDeS), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35001 Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, Spain

2. Departamento de Ingeniería Agraria y del Medio Natural, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain

Abstract

This research is framed in behavioral economics. This area tests the orthodox assumptions that individuals are rational, self-interested and possess all freely available information, and. Behavioral economics plays an important role for policymakers in areas such as environmental protection. We observe that despite being very concerned about environmental problems, the reality is that a great heterogeneity of behaviors is observed. Faced with the same level of concern, some citizens act coherently by adopting pro-environmental behaviors, while others do not. This latter response is supposed to generate cognitive dissonance. Accordingly, we expect that the levels of pro-environmental behavior should be more in line with observed levels of concern. Understanding pro-environmental behavior (PEB) is still a challenge. Insight into causal mechanisms of environmental concern on PEB could shed light on the effectiveness of environmental strategies such as land management, recycling, environmental taxes, water quality, human health, and prevention of further biodiversity loss. We employ a structural equation model to identify mechanisms through which environmental concern affects PEB. We prove that causal mechanisms between environmental concern dimensions, i.e., environmental concern in a broad sense, such as affection, cognitive, conative and active-are not independent. Additionally, we demonstrate that the average indirect effect (ACME), the average direct effect (ADE) and the average total effect (TE) of environmental concern on pro-environmental behavior depend on the baseline status of environmental concern in a narrow sense, i.e., worry or affection for environmental protection. The magnitude of the effects is also moderated by situational factors such as income, age, education, household size, and municipality size. This psychological construct (environmental concern) allows us to better understand the observed heterogeneity related to PEB which affects the economic efficiency of political measures.

Funder

European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference54 articles.

1. Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change;Bamberg;J. Environ. Psychol.,2013

2. Social identity and environmental concern: The importance of contextual effects;Brieger;Environ. Behav.,2019

3. Analyzing differences between different types of pro-environmental behaviors: Do attitude intensity and type of knowledge matter?;Escario;RCR Adv.,2019

4. Dunlap, R.E., and Michelson, W. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Greenwood Press.

5. Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale;Dunlap;J. Soc. Issues,2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3