A Comparison of the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) Guidelines and the “Implementation of Governance, Forest Landscapes, and Livelihoods” Project in Lao PDR: The FPIC Team Composition and the Implementation Process

Author:

Sawathvong Soukphavanh1,Hyakumura Kimihiko2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forestry, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, That Dam Campus, Chanthaboury District, Vientiane P.O. Box 2932, Laos

2. Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan

Abstract

Free, prior, and informed consent, or FPIC, is a crucial component of reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD+) projects. This study addresses a significant research gap regarding FPIC in the context of REDD+ projects, with a focus on the Implementation of Governance, Forest Landscapes, and Livelihoods (I-GFLL) project in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR). This research aimed to evaluate the FPIC’s components and implementation. We employed a literature review of the FPIC implementation reports from 242 targeted villages involved in the I-GFLL project and face-to-face interviews with 12 key informants. The research found positive aspects, such as female team membership, boosting ethnic women’s participation; the exclusion of forestry officials to foster an open dialogue; and respect for project rejections, displaying adherence to the FPIC principles. However, some challenging aspects were also highlighted, such as the exclusion of civil society organizations (CSOs) and non-government organizations (NGOs) and the loss of their expertise; limited team knowledge of forestry/climate change, hindering communication; short consultation durations; and an incomplete understanding of technical terms due to the project’s novelty, raising concerns. The study emphasizes the importance of crafting FPIC teams that promote communication, respect community rights, and, ultimately, ensure successful project implementation.

Funder

JICA: SDGs Global Leadership Program

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference64 articles.

1. Debating REDD+ and its implications: Reply to Angelsen et al;Fletcher;Conserv. Biol.,2017

2. UNFCCC (2010). 16 the Cancun Agreement, UNFCCC. Presented at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

3. Gender, climate change and REDD+ in the Congo Basin forests of Central Africa;Brown;Int. For. Rev.,2011

4. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance?;Phelps;Science,2010

5. Jagger, P., Lawlor, K., Brockhaus, M., Gebara, M.F., Sonwa, D.J., and Resosudarmo, I.A.P. (2012). REDD+ Safeguards in National Policy Discourse and Pilot Projects. Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices, CIFOR.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3