Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools

Author:

Golla Kathrin12ORCID,Benesic Andreas3ORCID,Mannell Hanna14,Dreischulte Tobias5,Grill Eva6ORCID,Strobach Dorothea12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Doctoral Program Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany

2. Hospital Pharmacy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany

3. Department of Internal Medicine—Gastroenterology, Krankenhaus GmbH Weilheim-Schongau, Marie-Eberth Str. 6, 86956 Schongau, Germany

4. Department of Physiology, Institute for Theoretical Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany

5. Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstr. 8a, 80336 Munich, Germany

6. Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometrics and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany

Abstract

Hepatic impairment (HI) influences the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and represents an important risk factor for drug safety. A reliable screening tool for HI identification at hospital admission by pharmacists would be desirable but is currently lacking. Therefore, we tested four liver scores as potential screening instruments. We retrospectively recorded liver/bile diagnoses, symptoms and abnormalities (summarized as hepatic findings) of 200 surgical patients followed by an assessment of the relevance of these findings for drug therapy (rating). The agreement between the Model of Endstage Liver Disease (MELD), Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), Fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), and aspartate-aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and the rating was quantified by Cohen’s Kappa. The performance of the scores in this setting was further evaluated by their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Of 200 patients, 18 (9%) had hepatic findings relevant for drug therapy. Fair agreement was found for FIB-4 and MELD and slight agreement for APRI and NFS compared to the rating. The highest values for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 41.2% (MELD), 99.3% (APRI), 66.7% (APRI), and 93.6% (MELD), respectively. Due to low performance, none of the scores can be recommended for clinical use as a single screening tool for HI at hospital admission.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3