Direct Interface Circuits for Resistive, Capacitive, and Inductive Sensors: A Review
-
Published:2025-06-11
Issue:12
Volume:14
Page:2393
-
ISSN:2079-9292
-
Container-title:Electronics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Electronics
Author:
Puentes-Conde Geu M.1, Sifuentes Ernesto1ORCID, Molina Javier1ORCID, Enríquez-Aguilera Francisco1, Bravo Gabriel1ORCID, Enríquez Guadalupe Navarro2
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Engineering and Technology, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez (UACJ), Ciudad Juárez 32310, Mexico 2. Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Juárez (ITCJ), Ciudad Juárez 32500, Mexico
Abstract
Direct interface circuits (DICs) connect resistive, capacitive, and inductive sensors directly to microcontrollers or FPGAs, eliminating analog conditioning stages and offering compact, low-cost, and low-power instrumentation. This systematic review qualitatively synthesizes research up to March 2025 on DIC operation principles, performance metrics, and application domains. Following PRISMA guidelines, 90 studies from IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, MDPI, SpringerLink, Scopus, and Google Scholar were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria. Most studies focused on RC-based circuits (53%), followed by RL-based (5%) and charge transfer capacitive interfaces (5%). RC-DICs demonstrated accuracies below 0.01% using adaptive calibration; RL-DICs achieved resolutions of 10–12 bits with higher cycle requirements, while charge transfer interfaces presented systematic errors up to ±5% due to parasitic capacitances. Environmental monitoring, biomedical sensing, liquid-level control, and vehicular detection were frequent application fields. Due to methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized qualitatively without quantitative meta-analysis or formal bias assessments. Future research directions include enhanced noise immunity, simplified calibration, and robust parasitic effect compensation.
Reference106 articles.
1. Sehrawat, D., and Gill, N.S. (2019, January 23–25). Smart Sensors: Analysis of Different Types of IoT Sensors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), Tirunelveli, India. 2. The application of wearable smart sensors for monitoring the vital signs of patients in epidemics: A systematic literature review;Mohammadzadeh;J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput.,2023 3. Ramírez-Moreno, M.A., Keshtkar, S., Padilla-Reyes, D.A., Ramos-López, E., García-Martínez, M., Hernández-Luna, M.C., Mogro, A.E., Mahlknecht, J., Huertas, J.I., and Peimbert-García, R.E. (2021). Sensors for Sustainable Smart Cities: A Review. Appl. Sci., 11. 4. Daugherty, K.M. (1995). Analog-to-Digital Conversion. A Practical Approach, McGraw Hill. 5. Webster, J.G., and Eren, H. (1999). Characteristics of instrumentation. Measurement, Instrumentation, and Sensors Handbook, CRC Press.
|
|