Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients’ Choice for Radical Treatment

Author:

Esperto Francesco1,Cacciatore Loris1,Tedesco Francesco1,Testa Antonio1,Callè Pasquale1,Ragusa Alberto1,Deanesi Noemi1,Minore Antonio1,Prata Francesco1,Brassetti Aldo2ORCID,Papalia Rocco1ORCID,Scarpa Roberto Mario1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy

2. Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) surgery has a strong impact on men’s social and sexual lives. For this reason, many patients ask for robotic surgery. To assess the rate of lost patients due to the lack of a robotic platform (RPl) at our center, we retrospectively selected 577 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2020 and 2021 who were eligible for radical prostatectomy (RP) (ISUP ≥ 2; age ≤ 70 yr). Patients eligible for surgery who decided to be operated received a phone call interview asking the reason for their choice. Overall, 230 patients (31.7%) underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical prostatectomy (LaRP) at our center, while 494 patients (68.3%) were not treated in our hospital. Finally, 347 patients were included: 87 patients (25.1%) underwent radiotherapy; 59 patients (17%) were already under another urologist’s care; 113 patients (32.5%) underwent robotic surgery elsewhere; and 88 patients (25.4%) followed the suggestion of friends or relatives based on their surgical experience. Despite no surgical technique for RP having shown superiority in terms of oncological or functional outcomes, patients eligible for PCa treatment decided to be operated on elsewhere because of the lack of an RPl. Our results show how the presence of an RPl may increase the case volume of RP by 49% at our center.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference50 articles.

1. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in urology. Radical prostatectomy and reconstructive retroperitoneal interventions;Binder;Urol. Ausg. A,2002

2. Mottet, N., Cornford, P., van den Bergh, R.C.N., Briers, E., Eberli, D., and De Meerleer, G. (2023, March 20). European Association of Urology Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Available online: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer.

3. Social Media and Misinformation in Urology: What Can Be Done?;Teoh;BJU Int.,2021

4. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted versus Open Radical Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer;Ilic;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2017

5. A Case-Mix-Adjusted Comparison of Early Oncological Outcomes of Open and Robotic Prostatectomy Performed by Experienced High Volume Surgeons;Silberstein;BJU Int.,2013

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3