Academics’ Epistemological Attitudes towards Academic Social Networks and Social Media

Author:

Sivoronova Jevgenija12ORCID,Vorobjovs Aleksejs2,Raščevskis Vitālijs2

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Daugavpils University, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia

2. Education and Psychology Department, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Daugavpils University, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia

Abstract

Academic social networks and social media have revolutionised the way individuals gather information and express themselves, particularly in academia, science, and research. Through the lens of academics, this study aims to investigate the epistemological and psychosocial aspects of these knowledge sources. The epistemological attitude model presented a framework to delve into and reflect upon the existence of knowledge sources, comprising subjective, interactional, and knowledge dimensions. One hundred and twenty-six university academics participated in this study, including lecturers and researchers from different higher education institutions in Latvia. The study employed two methods: the Epistemological Attitudes towards Sources of Knowledge Questionnaire and the Epistemological Attitudes towards Sources of Knowledge Semantic Questionnaire. The data analysis involved several procedures, including exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, and test statistics. By implementing these methods, the study gained valuable insights into the sources of knowledge, examining them from two perspectives. The first perspective brought attention to the differences in academics’ appraisals by discussing their understanding, approach, use, and valuations of these sources. By scrutinising the constructs of meanings, the second perspective sheds light on the anticipated knowledge which is deemed ideal, the concrete knowledge that is both social and objective, and the subjectively valuable nature of academic social networks and social media. The findings underscore the specialised knowledge and qualities that academics rely on for producing knowledge. In terms of epistemology, methodology, social science, and education, the study holds theoretical and practical implications, especially in comprehending knowledge and its sources.

Funder

ESF

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference109 articles.

1. Social media in higher education: Understanding how colleges and universities use Facebook;Peruta;J. Mark. High. Educ.,2016

2. The effect of customers’ social media participation on customer visit frequency and profitability: An empirical investigation;Rishika;Inf. Syst. Res.,2013

3. Caicedo, C., and Vasquez, F.E. (2015, January 24–27). Academic Social Networking Sites: A Comparative Analysis of Their Services and Tools. Proceedings of the IConference 2015, Irvine, CA, USA.

4. Social capital theory perspective on the role of academic social networking sites;J. Bus. Res.,2023

5. Research output availability on academic social networks: Implications for stakeholders in academic publishing;Null;Electron. Mark.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3