Development of Hallux Valgus Classification Using Digital Foot Images with Machine Learning

Author:

Hida Mitsumasa12ORCID,Eto Shinji3ORCID,Wada Chikamune3ORCID,Kitagawa Kodai4ORCID,Imaoka Masakazu12,Nakamura Misa12ORCID,Imai Ryota12ORCID,Kubo Takanari1,Inoue Takao1,Sakai Keiko1,Orui Junya12ORCID,Tazaki Fumie1,Takeda Masatoshi12,Hasegawa Ayuna5,Yamasaka Kota5,Nakao Hidetoshi6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rehabilitation, Osaka Kawasaki Rehabilitation University, Mizuma 158, Kaizuka 597-0104, Japan

2. Graduate School of Rehabilitation, Osaka Kawasaki Rehabilitation University, Mizuma 158, Kaizuka 597-0104, Japan

3. Graduate School of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Hibikino 2-4, Wakamatsu-ku, Kitakyushu 808-0135, Japan

4. Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Hachinohe College, 16-1 Uwanotai, Tamonoki, Hachinohe 039-1192, Japan

5. Department of Rehabilitation, Takata-Kamitani Hospital, Kamiyamaguchi 4-26-14, Yamaguchi, Nishinomiya 651-1421, Japan

6. Department of Physical Therapy, Josai International University, 1 Gumyo, Togane 283-8555, Japan

Abstract

Hallux valgus, a frequently seen foot deformity, requires early detection to prevent it from becoming more severe. It is a medical economic problem, so a means of quickly distinguishing it would be helpful. We designed and investigated the accuracy of an early version of a tool for screening hallux valgus using machine learning. The tool would ascertain whether patients had hallux valgus by analyzing pictures of their feet. In this study, 507 images of feet were used for machine learning. Image preprocessing was conducted using the comparatively simple pattern A (rescaling, angle adjustment, and trimming) and slightly more complicated pattern B (same, plus vertical flip, binary formatting, and edge emphasis). This study used the VGG16 convolutional neural network. Pattern B machine learning was more accurate than pattern A. In our early model, Pattern A achieved 0.62 for accuracy, 0.56 for precision, 0.94 for recall, and 0.71 for F1 score. As for Pattern B, the scores were 0.79, 0.77, 0.96, and 0.86, respectively. Machine learning was sufficiently accurate to distinguish foot images between feet with hallux valgus and normal feet. With further refinement, this tool could be used for the easy screening of hallux valgus.

Funder

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research C

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Paleontology,Space and Planetary Science,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3