Breast-Gynaecological & Immuno-Oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) Consensus and Recommendations for the Management of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Author:

Elghazaly HeshamORCID,Rugo Hope S.,Azim Hamdy A.,Swain Sandra M.,Arun Banu,Aapro Matti,Perez Edith A.,Anderson Benjamin O.,Penault-Llorca Frederique,Conte PierfrancoORCID,El Saghir Nagi S.ORCID,Yip Cheng-Har,Ghosn Marwan,Poortmans PhilipORCID,Shehata Mohamed A.,Giuliano Armando E.,Leung Jessica W. T.,Guarneri Valentina,Gligorov Joseph,Gulluoglu Bahadir M.,Abdel Aziz Hany,Frolova Mona,Sabry Mohamed,Balch Charles M.,Orecchia Roberto,El-Zawahry Heba M.,Al-Sukhun SanaORCID,Abdel Karim Khaled,Kandil AlaaORCID,Paltuev Ruslan M.,Foheidi Meteb,El-Shinawi MohamedORCID,ElMahdy Manal,Abulkhair OmalkhairORCID,Yang Wentao,Aref Adel T.,Bakkach Joaira,Bahie Eldin Nermean,Elghazawy Hagar

Abstract

Background: The management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is challenging with several controversies and unmet needs. During the 12th Breast-Gynaecological & Immuno-oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) Egypt, 2020, a panel of 35 breast cancer experts from 13 countries voted on consensus guidelines for the clinical management of TNBC. The consensus was subsequently updated based on the most recent data evolved lately. Methods: A consensus conference approach adapted from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) was utilized. The panellists voted anonymously on each question, and a consensus was achieved when ≥75% of voters selected an answer. The final consensus was later circulated to the panellists for critical revision of important intellectual content. Results and conclusion: These recommendations represent the available clinical evidence and expert opinion when evidence is scarce. The percentage of the consensus votes, levels of evidence and grades of recommendation are presented for each statement. The consensus covered all the aspects of TNBC management starting from defining TNBC to the management of metastatic disease and highlighted the rapidly evolving landscape in this field. Consensus was reached in 70% of the statements (35/50). In addition, areas of warranted research were identified to guide future prospective clinical trials.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3