Identification of Alcohol Use Prior to Major Cancer Surgery: Timeline Follow Back Interview Compared to Four Other Markers

Author:

Nicklasson Johanna1ORCID,Sjödell Moa1,Tønnesen Hanne12ORCID,Lauridsen Susanne Vahr234ORCID,Rasmussen Mette5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, 22100 Lund, Sweden

2. WHO Collaborating Centre for Evidence-Based Clinical Health Promotion, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2000 Copenhagen, Denmark

3. Department of Surgery, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark

4. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark

5. National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

Background: The postoperative complication rate is 30–64% among patients undergoing muscle-invasive and recurrent high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer surgery. Preoperative risky alcohol use increases the risk. The aim was to evaluate the accuracy of markers for identifying preoperative risky alcohol. Methods: Diagnostic test sub-study of a randomized controlled trial (STOP-OP trial), based on a cohort of 94 patients scheduled for major bladder cancer surgery. Identification of risky alcohol use using Timeline Follow Back interviews (TLFB) were compared to the AUDIT–C questionnaire and three biomarkers: carbohydrate-deficient transferrin in plasma (P–CDT), phosphatidyl-ethanol in blood (B–PEth), and ethyl glucuronide in urine (U–EtG). Results: The correlation between TLFB and AUDIT–C was strong (ρ = 0.75), while it was moderate between TLFB and the biomarkers (ρ = 0.55–0.65). Overall, sensitivity ranged from 56 to 82% and specificity from 38 to 100%. B–PEth showed the lowest sensitivity at 56%, but the highest specificity of 100%. All tests had high positive predictive values (79–100%), but low negative predictive values (42–55%). Conclusions: Despite high positive predictive values, negative predictive values were weak compared to TLFB. For now, TLFB interviews seem preferable for preoperative identification of risky alcohol use.

Funder

The Novo Nordic Foundation

Flemming Lunds Foundation

Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation

The Danish Bladder Cancer Group

Medac and Löf (Landstingens Ömsesidiga Försäkringsbolag) in Sweden

The Oak Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3