First-Line Immunotherapy with Check-Point Inhibitors: Prospective Assessment of Cognitive Function

Author:

Myers Jamie S.1ORCID,Parks Adam C.2,Mahnken Jonathan D.3,Young Kate J.3,Pathak Harsh B.4,Puri Rajni V.4,Unrein Amber5,Switzer Phyllis5,Abdulateef Yazan6,Sullivan Samantha5,Walker John F.5,Streeter David3,Burns Jeffrey M.5

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA

2. Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA

3. Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA

4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA

5. University of Kansas Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Fairway, KS 66111, USA

6. Department of Quality Assurance, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA

Abstract

Approximately 40% of patients with cancer are eligible for check-point inhibitor (CPI) therapy. Little research has examined the potential cognitive impact of CPIs. First-line CPI therapy offers a unique research opportunity without chemotherapy-related confounders. The purpose of this prospective, observational pilot was to (1) demonstrate the feasibility of prospective recruitment, retention, and neurocognitive assessment for older adults receiving first-line CPI(s) and (2) provide preliminary evidence of changes in cognitive function associated with CPI(s). Patients receiving first-line CPI(s) (CPI Group) were assessed at baseline (n = 20) and 6 months (n = 13) for self-report of cognitive function and neurocognitive test performance. Results were compared to age-matched controls without cognitive impairment assessed annually by the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC). Plasma biomarkers were measured at baseline and 6 months for the CPI Group. Estimated differences for CPI Group scores prior to initiating CPIs (baseline) trended to lower performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Blind (MOCA-Blind) test compared to the ADRC controls (p = 0.066). Controlling for age, the CPI Group’s 6-months MOCA-Blind performance was lower than the ADRC control group’s 12-months performance (p = 0.011). No significant differences in biomarkers were detected between baseline and 6 months, although significant correlations were noted for biomarker change and cognitive performance at 6 months. IFNγ, IL-1β, IL-2, FGF2, and VEGF were inversely associated with Craft Story Recall performance (p < 0.05), e.g., higher levels correlated with poorer memory performance. Higher IGF-1 and VEGF correlated with better letter-number sequencing and digit-span backwards performance, respectively. Unexpected inverse correlation was noted between IL-1α and Oral Trail-Making Test B completion time. CPI(s) may have a negative impact on some neurocognitive domains and warrant further investigation. A multi-site study design may be crucial to fully powering prospective investigation of the cognitive impact of CPIs. Establishment of a multi-site observational registry from collaborating cancer centers and ADRCs is recommended.

Funder

University of Kansas Cancer Center

Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine COBRE

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference39 articles.

1. ACS (2023, January 23). Cancer Facts and Figures. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures.html.

2. Cancer- and cancer treatment-associated cognitive change: An update on the state of the science;Ahles;J. Clin. Oncol.,2012

3. An update on cancer- and chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction: Current status;Janelsins;Semin. Oncol.,2011

4. Neuropsychological performance in survivors of breast cancer more than 20 years after adjuvant chemotherapy;Koppelmans;J. Clin. Oncol.,2012

5. Cognitive function and fatigue after diagnosis of colorectal cancer;Vardy;Ann. Oncol.,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3