Palliative Care Clinician Perspectives on Person-Centered End-of-Life Communication for Racially and Culturally Minoritized Persons with Cancer

Author:

Rosa William E.1ORCID,McDarby Meghan1,Buller Haley2,Ferrell Betty R.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA

2. City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine interdisciplinary clinicians’ perceptions of priorities in serious illness communication and shared decision-making with racially and culturally minoritized persons at end of life. Clinicians (N = 152) read a detailed case study about a patient self-identifying as Black and American Indian who describes mistrust of the healthcare system. Participants then responded to three open-ended questions about communication strategies and approaches they would employ in providing care. We conducted a thematic analysis of participants’ responses to questions using an iterative, inductive approach. Interdisciplinary clinicians from nursing (48%), social work (36%), and chaplaincy (16%), responded to the study survey. A total of four themes emerged: (1) person-centered, authentic, and culturally-sensitive care; (2) pain control; (3) approaches to build trust and connection; and (4) understanding communication challenges related to racial differences. Significant efforts have been made to train clinicians in culturally inclusive communication, yet we know little about how clinicians approach “real world” scenarios during which patients from structurally minoritized groups describe care concerns. We outline implications for identifying unconscious bias, informing educational interventions to support culturally inclusive communication, and improving the quality of end-of-life care for patients with cancer from minoritized groups.

Funder

National Institute of Health/National Cancer Institute

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference61 articles.

1. National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care Guidelines, 4th Edition;Ferrell;J. Palliat. Med.,2018

2. Palliative Care and the Quality of Life;Meier;J. Clin. Oncol.,2011

3. Models of Palliative Care Delivery for Patients with Cancer;Hui;J. Clin. Oncol.,2020

4. There is nothing informal about caregiving;Applebaum;Palliat. Support. Care,2022

5. Family caregiver inclusion is not a level playing field: Toward equity for the chosen families of sexual and gender minority patients;Rosa;Palliat. Care Soc. Pract.,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3