The Correlation of Computerized Scoring in Home Sleep Apnea Tests with Technician Visual Scoring for Assessing the Severity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Author:

Hawco Colton1ORCID,Bonthu Amrita2ORCID,Pasek Tristan1,Sarna Kaylee1ORCID,Smolley Laurence1,Hadeh Anas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 33331, USA

2. School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

Abstract

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects a significant proportion of the global population, with many having moderate or severe forms of the disease. Home Sleep Apnea Testing (HSAT) has become the most common method of diagnosing OSA, replacing in-lab polysomnography. Polysmith software Version 11 by Nihon Kohden allows for the automatic scoring of respiratory events. This study aimed to assess the validity of this technology. Study Objectives: The objective was to assess the accuracy of the Polysmith Software Automatic Scoring Algorithm of HSATs in comparison to that of sleep technicians. Methods: One hundred twenty HSATs were scored by both sleep technicians and Polysmith software. The measured values were the respiratory event index (REI), apneic events, and hypopneic events. Agreement between the two methods was reached by utilizing the Kruskal–Wallis test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Bland–Altman plot, as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: The correlation between the REI calculated by the software and technicians proved to be strong overall (r = 0.96, p < 0.0001). The mild OSA group had a moderate correlation (r = 0.45, p = 0.0129). The primary snoring, moderate OSA, and severe OSA groups showed stronger correlations (r = 0.69, p < 0.0001; r = 0.56, p = 0.012; r = 0.71, p < 0.0001). The analysis conducted across all groups demonstrated an average sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 94%, PPV of 82%, and NPV of 94%, with an overall accuracy of 81%. When combining the moderate and severe OSA groups into a single category, the sensitivity was 90%, specificity was 100%, PPV was 100%, and NPV was 91%. Conclusions: OSA can be reliably diagnosed from HSATs with the automated Polysmith software across all OSA disease severity groups, with higher levels of accuracy in moderate/severe OSA and lower levels of accuracy in mild OSA.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference31 articles.

1. Multinight Prevalence, Variability, and Diagnostic Misclassification of Obstructive Sleep Apnea;Lechat;Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,2022

2. Clinical Use of a Home Sleep Apnea Test: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Position Statement;Rosen;J. Clin. Sleep Med.,2017

3. Systematic review of the different aspects of primary snoring;Jacquet;Sleep Med. Rev.,2019

4. Cumpston, E., and Chen, P. (2024). Sleep Apnea Syndrome, StatPearls Publishing.

5. Obstructive Sleep Apnea;Strollo;N. Engl. J. Med.,1996

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3