Survival and Marginal Bone Loss in Immediate Post-Extraction Implants versus Delayed Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Portal-Solera Alba1,Pardal-Peláez Beatriz1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain

Abstract

There are a series of protocols regarding the placement of dental implants after tooth extraction. The advantages and disadvantages that determine the procedure and timing of each dental implant placement process are key to achieving success. The main objective of this study was to elucidate/establish/determine whether there are differences in the survival and marginal bone loss between implants placed immediately after placement and those placed following a delayed protocol. A search was conducted in Pubmed, BVS, and Cochrane. Eleven randomized clinical trials that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected, and a meta-analysis was carried out to compare the implant failures and marginal bone loss between study groups. The analysis showed that delayed implant placement had fewer failures (odds ratio, fixed effects: 3.47 [CI: 95% (1.17, 10.48)]). As regards marginal bone loss, there was a tendency towards less tissue loss in the delayed placement group (mean difference, random effects: 0.11 [CI: 95% (−0.10, 0.33)]); however, further research is needed to evaluate this variable.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference37 articles.

1. Quality of dental implants;Jokstad;Int. Dent. J.,2003

2. History of implantology and osseointegration, before and after Branemark;Rev. Estomatol. Hered.,2014

3. Reaction of bone to multiple metallic implants;Bothe;Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.,1940

4. Lemus Cruz, L.M., Urrutia, Z.A., and Castell, A.C.L. (2009). Origin and evolution of dental implants. Rev. Habanera Cienc. Medicas, 8.

5. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets;Chen;Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implant.,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3