HIPNOSE: definição, importância, limitações e possibilidades baseadas em evidências

Author:

Souza Filipe Luís,Broering Camilla Volpato

Abstract

The primary objective of this review is to analyze the main theoretical perspectives that define hypnosis, the value of considering it as a unique phenomenon, the evidence that sustains that view, and its effect on research. For more than a century in which the subject has been studied, the results are still hampered by a methodological flaw since the beginning of the research, the definition of the phenomenon. This review used the Medline via Pubmed as database for bibliographic search, including a total of 41 studies, where it could be found that 72,7% of the surveyed studies, adopt the approach in which there's an alternate state of consciousness to explain the phenomenon and to guide its interpretations, even though there isn't enough evidence to sustain the existence of an alternate state of consciousness exclusively hypnotic and it's relation to the capability of hypnotic response. In conclusion, it's suggested the performance of more studies that bring a merger between sociocognitive and state of mind perspectives, so that the findings can come to help with the evolution of hypnosis, which already presents strong results when applied in different medical and psychotherapeutic treatments, predominantly in the Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy.

Publisher

Psicologia e Saude em Debate

Subject

General Medicine

Reference73 articles.

1. Adachi, T., Fujino, H., Nakae, A., Mashimo, T., & Sasaki, J. (2013). A Meta-Analysis of Hypnosis for Chronic Pain Problems:A Comparison Between Hypnosis, Standard Care, and Other Psychological Interventions. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 62(1), 1–28.Recuperado em 28 setembro, 2022, de https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2013.841471

2. Alempijevic, D., Beriashvili, R., Beynon, J., Alempijevic Petersen, D., Birmanns, B., Brasholt, M., Cohen, J., Alempijevic Petersen, D., Duque, M., Duterte, P., Van Es, A., Fernando, R., Korur Fincanci, S., Holger Hansen, S., Hamzeh, S., Hardi, L., Heisler, M., Iacopino, V., Mygind Leth, P., & Lin, J. (2020). Statement of the Independent Forensic Expert Group on Conversion Therapy. Torture: Quarterly Journal on Rehabilitation of Torture Victims and Prevention of Torture, 30(1), 66–78. Recuperado em 28 setembro, 2022, de https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v30i1.119654

3. Alladin, A. (2018). Cognitive hypnotherapy for psychological management of depression in palliative care. Annals of Palliative Medicine, 7(1), 112–124. Recuperado em 28 setembro, 2022, de https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2017.08.15

4. Alladin, A., & Alibhai, A. (2007). Cognitive Hypnotherapy for Depression:An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 55(2), 147–166. Recuperado em 28 setembro, 2022, de https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140601177897

5. Ashmawi, H.A. (2020) Epidemiologia da dor [Review of Epidemiologia da dor]. Anestesiologia USP: 17-19. Recuperado em 28 setembro, 2022, de https://www.anestesiologiausp.com.br/wp-content/uploads/epidemiologia-da-dor_2020.pdf

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3