Comparing individual and group-level simulated neurophysiological brain connectivity using the Jansen and Rit neural mass model

Author:

Kulik S. D.123ORCID,Douw L.12,van Dellen E.4,Steenwijk M. D.13,Geurts J. J. G.13,Stam C. J.5,Hillebrand A.5,Schoonheim M. M.13,Tewarie P.5

Affiliation:

1. Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

4. University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

5. Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurology and Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Computational models are often used to assess how functional connectivity (FC) patterns emerge from neuronal population dynamics and anatomical brain connections. It remains unclear whether the commonly used group-averaged data can predict individual FC patterns. The Jansen and Rit neural mass model was employed, where masses were coupled using individual structural connectivity (SC). Simulated FC was correlated to individual magnetoencephalography-derived empirical FC. FC was estimated using phase-based (phase lag index (PLI), phase locking value (PLV)), and amplitude-based (amplitude envelope correlation (AEC)) metrics to analyze their goodness of fit for individual predictions. Individual FC predictions were compared against group-averaged FC predictions, and we tested whether SC of a different participant could equally well predict participants’ FC patterns. The AEC provided a better match between individually simulated and empirical FC than phase-based metrics. Correlations between simulated and empirical FC were higher using individual SC compared to group-averaged SC. Using SC from other participants resulted in similar correlations between simulated and empirical FC compared to using participants’ own SC. This work underlines the added value of FC simulations using individual instead of group-averaged SC for this particular computational model and could aid in a better understanding of mechanisms underlying individual functional network trajectories.

Funder

ZonMW Vidi grant

Publisher

MIT Press

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Artificial Intelligence,Computer Science Applications,General Neuroscience

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3