Molecular Alterations Between the Primary Breast Cancer and the Subsequent Locoregional/Metastatic Tumor

Author:

Macfarlane Robyn1,Seal Melanie1,Speers Caroline2,Woods Ryan2,Masoudi Hamad3,Aparicio Samuel4,Chia Stephen K.12

Affiliation:

1. a Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada

2. b Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada;

3. c Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;

4. d Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Learning Objectives: After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Describe the rate of discordance of predictive marker phenotype (i.e., ER/PR, HER2) between the primary and the relapsed/metastatic breast cancer lesion.Explain the impact of a change in predictive marker phenotype between the primary and relapsed/metastatic lesion on treatment options for these patients. This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com Background. Metastatic breast cancers have historically been presumed to have the same predictive biomarkers as the initial primary tumor. We compared the expression of these biomarkers in a large paired tissue microarray (TMA) series of primary and subsequent relapsed tumors. Methods. Using the British Columbia Cancer Agency Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit database, patients with biopsy-proven relapses were identified and linked to a large TMA series of primary breast cancers from 1986–1992. Charts were reviewed, and tissue blocks of the metastatic cancer were collected to create a separate TMA. Immunohistochemical assessment with the same antibodies and conditions was performed for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 on both the primary and relapsed tumors. Results. One hundred sixty cases were received that had tumor adequate for analyses. Of these, 71.9% had no changes in either the ER or PR status or HER-2 status. Of the 45 (28.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.2%–35.1%) tumors that did have changes in receptor status, 7.5% were in-breast recurrences or new breast primaries, 4.4% had changes in PR status only and were therefore deemed clinically irrelevant, and 19.4% (95% CI, 13.3%–25.5%) had changes in either the ER or HER-2 status from regional or distant relapses. Five percent of tumors had a receptor status change going from ER+ or PR+ to ER− or PR−; 9.4% went from ER− or PR− to ER+ or PR+. With regard to HER-2 status, 3.8% of tumors went from positive to negative and 1.3% went from negative to positive. For all discordant cases, biopsies of the relapsed lesion were obtained prior to initiation of first-line treatment for metastatic disease. In the primary tumors that were ER+, time to relapse was significantly shorter in the discordant relapsed cases than in the concordant ones (p = .0002). Changes in loss or gain of either biomarker were seen across the discordant cases. Conclusions. A significant proportion of relapsed tumors had changes in either ER or HER-2 status, which would dramatically alter treatment recommendations and clinical behavior. This study suggests that biopsies of relapsed and metastatic breast cancers should be performed routinely in clinical practice.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference26 articles.

1. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials;Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG);Lancet,2005

2. The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population-based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer;Chia;Cancer,2007

3. Multiple estrogen receptor assays in human breast cancer;Hull;Cancer Res,1983

4. Multiple progesterone receptor assays in human breast cancer;Gross;Cancer Res,1984

5. Does confirmatory tumor biopsy alter the management of breast cancer patients with distant metastases?;Simmons;Ann Oncol,2009

Cited by 38 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3