Upfront Surgical Resection of Melanoma Brain Metastases Provides a Bridge Toward Immunotherapy-Mediated Systemic Control

Author:

Alvarez-Breckenridge Christopher1,Giobbie-Hurder Anita2,Gill Corey M.3,Bertalan Mia3,Stocking Jackson3,Kaplan Alexander3,Nayyar Naema34,Lawrence Donald P.4,Flaherty Keith T.4,Shih Helen A.5,Oh Kevin5,Batchelor Tracy T.356,Cahill Daniel P.1,Sullivan Ryan4,Brastianos Priscilla K.34

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

2. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

3. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

4. Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

6. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint blockade has systemic efficacy in patients with metastatic melanoma, including those with brain metastases (MBMs). However, immunotherapy-induced intracranial tumoral inflammation can lead to neurologic compromise, requiring steroids, which abrogate the systemic efficacy of this approach. We investigated whether upfront neurosurgical resection of MBM is associated with a therapeutic advantage when performed prior to initiation of immunotherapy. Material and Methods An institutional review board-approved, retrospective study identified 142 patients with MBM treated with immune checkpoint blockade between 2010 and 2016 at Massachusetts General Hospital, of whom 79 received surgery. Patients were classified based on the temporal relationship between immunotherapy, surgery, and development of central nervous system metastases. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of diagnosis of MBM until death from any cause. Multivariate model building included a prognostic Cox model of OS, the effect of immunotherapy and surgical sequencing on OS, and the effect of immunotherapy and radiation sequencing on OS. Results The 2-year overall survival for patients treated with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4, programmed death 1, or combinatorial blockade was 19%, 54%, and 57%, respectively. Among immunotherapy-naïve melanoma brain metastases, surgery followed by immunotherapy had a median survival of 22.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.6–39.2) compared with 10.8 months for patients treated with immunotherapy alone (95% CI, 7.8–16.3) and 9.4 months for patients treated with immunotherapy followed by surgery (95% CI, 4.1 to ∞; p = .12). On multivariate analysis, immunotherapy-naïve brain metastases treated with immunotherapy alone were associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.00–2.99) compared with immunotherapy-naïve brain metastases treated with surgery followed by immunotherapy. Conclusion In treatment-naïve patients, early surgical resection for local control should be considered prior to commencing immunotherapy. A prospective, randomized trial comparing the sequence of surgery and immunotherapy for treatment-naïve melanoma brain metastases is warranted.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference28 articles.

1. The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based review of the role of radiosurgery for brain metastases;Mehta;Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005

2. The management of brain metastases;Patchell;Cancer Treat Rev,2003

3. Demographics, prognosis, and therapy in 702 patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma;Sampson;J Neurosurg,1998

4. Disease presentation and outcome in young patients (<40 years) with brain metastases from malignant melanoma;Nieder;Anticancer Res,2008

5. Determinants of outcome in melanoma patients with cerebral metastases;Fife;J Clin Oncol,2004

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3