Systemic Chemotherapy as Salvage Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Who Fail to Respond to Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Author:

Sclafani Francesco1,Brown Gina2,Cunningham David1,Rao Sheela1,Tekkis Paris3,Tait Diana1,Morano Federica1,Baratelli Chiara1,Kalaitzaki Eleftheria4,Rasheed Shahnawaz3,Watkins David1,Starling Naureen1,Wotherspoon Andrew5,Chau Ian1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, United Kingdom

2. Department of Radiology The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, United Kingdom

3. Department of Surgery The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, United Kingdom

4. Department of Clinical Research and Development The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, United Kingdom

5. Department of Histopathology The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Background The potential of chemotherapy as salvage treatment after failure of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has never been explored. We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis to address this question. Patients and Methods Patients with newly diagnosed LARC who were inoperable or candidates for extensive (i.e., beyond total mesorectal excision [TME]) surgery after long-course chemoradiotherapy and who received salvage chemotherapy were included. The primary objective was to estimate the proportion of patients who became suitable for TME after chemotherapy. Results Forty-five patients were eligible (39 candidates for extensive surgery and 6 unresectable). Previous radiotherapy was given concurrently with chemotherapy in 43 cases (median dose: 54.0 Gy). Oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based salvage chemotherapy was administered in 40 (88.9%) and 5 (11.1%) cases, respectively. Eight patients (17.8%) became suitable for TME after chemotherapy, 10 (22.2%) ultimately underwent TME with clear margins, and 2 (4.4%) were managed with a watch and wait approach. Additionally, 13 patients had extensive surgery with curative intent. Three-year progression-free survival and 5-year overall survival in the entire population were 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.0–46.0) and 44.0% (95% CI: 26.0–61.0), respectively. For the curatively resected and “watch and wait” patients, these figures were 52.0% (95% CI: 27.0–73.0) and 67.0% (95% CI: 40.0–84.0), respectively. Conclusion Systemic chemotherapy may be an effective salvage strategy for LARC patients who fail to respond to chemoradiotherapy and are inoperable or candidates for beyond TME surgery. According to our study, one out of five patients may become resectable or be spared from an extensive surgery after systemic chemotherapy.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3