Abstract
We contend that the collective action of state-oriented challengers is politically mediated, and that the impact of collective action will differ according to political contexts. More specifically, we argue that mobilization and limited protest will yield collective benefits in specified favorable political circumstances; more assertive action is required in specified less favorable circumstances. In addition to specifying these arguments, we go some distance toward appraising them, by examining the Townsend Movement, an American old-age pension challenger of the 1930s and 1940s, and the politics of old-age pensions in California. Historical, "similar systems," and regression analyses indicate that the movement had an impact on California old-age policy that varied according to the expectations of our political mediation arguments.
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Multilayered framing in Turkish Anti-GM Movement;Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi;2022-03-29
2. Books in the Series (continued from p. ii);Movements and Parties;2021-08-26
3. Index;Movements and Parties;2021-08-26
4. References;Movements and Parties;2021-08-26
5. Conclusions;Movements and Parties;2021-08-26