The Optimal Cut-off of BIPSS in Differential Diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s Syndrome: Is Stimulation Necessary?

Author:

Chen Shi1,Chen Kang2ORCID,Wang Shirui2,Zhu Huijuan1,Lu Lin1,Zhang Xiaobo3,Tong Anli1,Pan Hui1,Wang Renzhi4,Lu Zhaolin1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Translation Medicine Centre, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

2. Eight-Year Program of Clinical Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

3. Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

Abstract

Abstract Contexts Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) can differentiate Cushing’s disease (CD) and ectopic adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) syndrome (EAS). The traditional cutoff of inferior petrosal sinus to peripheral (IPS:P) ACTH gradient was 2 before stimulation and 3 after stimulation, which yielded unsatisfactory sensitivity in some studies. Objectives To determine the optimal cutoff in BIPSS before or after desmopressin stimulation and to evaluate the necessity of stimulation. Design and Setting Single-center retrospective study (2011–2018) along with meta-analysis. Patients 226 CD and 24 EAS patients with confirmed diagnosis who underwent BIPSS with desmopressin stimulation. Results In the meta-analysis of 25 studies with 1249 CD and 152 EAS patients, the traditional cutoff yielded sensitivity of 86% and 97% and specificity of 98% and 100% before and after stimulation, respectively. We then analyzed the data from our center. With the traditional cutoff, the sensitivity was 87.2% (197/226) and 96.5% (218/226) before and after stimulation, and specificity was both 100% (25/25), which were close to the results of meta-analysis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff was 1.4 before stimulation and 2.8 after stimulation. With the new cutoff, the sensitivity was 94.7% (214/226) and 97.8% (221/226) while the specificity remained 100% (25/25) before and after stimulation. Among the 7 CD patients (7/226; 3.1%) for whom stimulation was necessary to get correct diagnosis, none has a pituitary lesion >6 mm by magnetic resonance imaging, and their sampling lateralization rate (P = .007) and peak ACTH level at dominant inferior petrosal sinus (P = .011) were lower than those among CD patients with IPS:P >1.4 before stimulation. Conclusions The optimal cutoff for IPS:P in BIPSS is different from the commonly-used one. The optimal cutoff value can yield satisfactory accuracy even without stimulation, and stimulation may be unnecessary for those with pituitary adenoma >6 mm.

Funder

Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation

Health Science Promotion Project of Beijing

National Key Research and Development Program of China

Publisher

The Endocrine Society

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Endocrinology,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Reference44 articles.

1. Cushing’s syndrome;Lacroix;Lancet.,2015

2. Diagnosis and management of Cushing’s syndrome: results of an Italian multicentre study. Study Group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology on the Pathophysiology of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis;Invitti;J Clin Endocrinol Metab.,1999

3. Pituitary mri findings in patients with pituitary and ectopic acth-dependent cushing syndrome: does a 6-mm pituitary tumor size cut-off value exclude ectopic acth syndrome?;Yogi-Morren;Endocr Pract.,2015

4. Petrosal sinus sampling for Cushing syndrome: anatomical and technical considerations. Work in progress;Doppman;Radiology.,1984

5. Treatment of cushing’s syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline;Nieman;J Clin Endocrinol Metab.,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3