Fractional CO2‐laser versus microneedle radiofrequency for acne scars: A randomized, single treatment, split‐face trial

Author:

Hendel Kristoffer1ORCID,Karmisholt Katrine1ORCID,Hedelund Lene2,Haedersdal Merete1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Dermatology Aaarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAblative fractional CO2 laser (AFL) is an established first‐line energy‐based treatment for acne scars. Microneedle radiofrequency (MNRF) is an emerging treatment, also targeting the skin in fractions. No studies have so far compared AFL with MNRF for acne scars in a direct controlled, side‐by‐side comparison. In this study, we compared AFL and MNRF treatments for acne scars in a randomized split‐face trial with blinded response evaluation, objective measures, and patient‐reported outcomes.Study Design/Materials and MethodFifteen patients with moderate to severe acne scars were included. At baseline each patient had two similar test areas identified, these were randomized to receive a single treatment with either AFL or MNRF. Standardized multilayer techniques were applied with AFL and MNRF, first targeting the scar base, thereafter the entire scar area. Outcome measures included blinded evaluation of clinical improvement of scar texture (0–10 scale) at 1‐ and 3‐months follow‐up, local skin reactions (LSR), pain according to Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), skin integrity quantified by transepidermal water loss, and patient satisfaction.ResultsFifteen patients completed the study with a median test area size of 24.6 cm2 (interquartile range [IQR] 14.9–40.6). A single treatment with AFL or MNRF equally resulted in a median 1‐point texture improvement after 3 months follow‐up (p < 0.001). Best responders achieved up to a 3‐point improvement (n = 3 test areas, 10% of treatment areas). Erythema and loss of skin integrity was more intense after AFL compared with MNRF after 2–4 days (p < 0.001). Patients reported MNRF (VAS 7.0) to be significantly more painful than AFL (5.5) (p = 0.009). Patients were generally satisfied with the overall outcome on a 10‐point scale at median 6 for both treatments (IQR 5–7).ConclusionAFL and MNRF treatments are equally effective at improving texture in skin with acne scars. AFL resulted in more pronounced LSRs whereas MNRF was more painful. Patients were generally satisfied with the overall outcome.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology,Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3