Effect and safety of mesenchymal stem cells for patients with COVID‐19: Systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis

Author:

Zhang Zhijing1,Shao Shuai1,Liu Xuefeng23ORCID,Tong Zhaohui1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao‐Yang Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China

2. Departments of Pathology, Urology, Radiation Oncology The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA

3. Comprehensive Cancer Center The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

Abstract

AbstractThe objective of this study was to assess whether mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy could offer survival advantages for patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). An electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang, and CNKI was performed from December 1, 2019 to December 25, 2022. The primary outcome was all‐cause mortality. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted in this meta analysis. Besides, subgroup analysis and meta‐regression was performed using a random‐effects model to find the potential sources of heterogeneity. Seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1073 patients with COVID‐19 were included in this study. Compared with the control group, patients in the MSCs groups were associated with significantly reduced all‐cause mortality (MSCs 18.4% vs. control 25.5%; risk ratio [RR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–0.90; p = 0.004; I² = 0%). For all secondary outcomes, there wasn't significant improvement in the experimental group versus the control group regarding symptom remission rate (53.2%, 201/378 vs. 46.5%, 164/353; RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00–1.32; p = 0.05; I² = 43%), but the pooled analysis revealed significant differences between the groups in length of hospital stay (MD: −3.82, 95% CI: −5.87 to −1.77; p = 0.0003, I2 = 0%), requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.33–0.82; p = 0.005; I2 = 0%) and post‐CRP level (MD: −31.61; 95% CI −46.74 to −16.49; p < 0.0001). Moreover, regarding the incidence of adverse events (AEs) (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.35–1.52; p = 0.39; I² = 44%) and serious adverse events (sAEs) (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.40–1.92; p = 0.73; I² = 39%), no significant differences were observed between MSCs and control groups. The TSA analysis showed that the result of all‐cause mortality might be false‐positive result. Based on the pooled results in this study, compared with standard treatment, MSCs therapy may reduce all‐cause mortality of patients with COVID‐19 with no increase risk of AEs and sAEs, but may not improve symptom remission rate. Further more high‐quality and large‐sample RCTs should be performed to confirm these findings.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Virology

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3